Take a look at ser #240013. Does this look like a typical production decline in the area?

Views: 62

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Bill, I am unsure what is typical for that general area but nothing appears unusual for the months reported.

LEASE\UNIT\WELL PRODUCTION
RPT DATE LUW CODE STORAGE FAC DOC USE WELL CNT OPENING STK OIL PROD(BBL) GAS PROD(MCF) DISPOSITION CLOSING STK PARISH
03/01/2010 615874 1 0 0 218237 0 0 DE SOTO
02/01/2010 615874 1 0 0 232381 0 0 DE SOTO
01/01/2010 615874 1 0 0 300039 0 0 DE SOTO
12/01/2009 615874 1 0 0 383217 0 0 DE SOTO
11/01/2009 615874 1 0 0 310707 0 0 DE SOTO
thanks. does the prod really drop 85% the first year?
Depends on the choke setting. A number of operators are experimenting with or have adopted tighter chokes settings. At this time there is insufficient production data and significant variances in the quality of the shale across the play as indicated by Petrohawk's EUR map to say for sure. 85% is possible but probably on the high end. The average range is probably in the 70-80% range.
thereabout

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Blog Posts

Tuscaloosa Trend Sits On Top Of Poorest Neighbourhood For Decades - Yet No Royalties Ever Paid To The Community -- Why??

In researching the decades-old Tuscaloosa Trend and the immense wealth it has generated for many, I find it deeply troubling that this resource-rich formation runs directly beneath one of the poorest communities in North Baton Rouge—near Southern University, Louisiana—yet neither the university ( that I am aware of)  nor local residents appear to have received any compensation for the minerals extracted from their land.

This area has suffered immense environmental degradation…

Continue

Posted by Char on May 29, 2025 at 14:42

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2025   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service