Encana Blackstone A-43H 32 MMcfe/d IP San Augustine
From their presentation today.
• Blackstone A43 H
success
• 32 MMcfe/d IP
• 9,500 psi back pressure
http://www.encana.com/investors/presentations/pdfs/20100614-capp-pr...
• Blackstone A43 H
success
• 32 MMcfe/d IP
• 9,500 psi back pressure
http://www.encana.com/investors/presentations/pdfs/20100614-capp-pr...
Tags: 32, A-43H, Augustine, Blackstone, Encana, IP, MMcfe/d, San
Views: 374
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by j garrett on
-
You better hope Cheerleader is not a 55 year old dude with a scruffy beard and a beer belly!
-
Permalink Reply by ken hatcher on
-
Well, the jury is still out.
-
Permalink Reply by Cheerleader on
-
The jury is "in" and it is unanimous!!!!! Cheerleader is an adorable blue eyed blond, 5'8" in a cute red, white and blue cheerleading outfit. Go Haynesville Shale!!
San Augustine rocks the Haynesville!!!
-
Permalink Reply by ALongview on
-
That was an admitted miscalculation on that well. That is the only completion that has dropped off like that in the county that I am aware of.
-
Permalink Reply by jffree1 on
-
What's pathetic is an adult who feels so threatened that they feel it necessary to "burst the bubble" so to speak of those who are enjoying their "moment" of good news/possible future good fortune. What could you possibly gain from doing that?
It's not like our good fortune is going to detract from NW La., after all. The operators have chosen their sandboxes and there is plenty to go around once demand increases.
The Kardell well is an exception... not the rule, in case you want to look at the production figures for the other handful of wells now reporting in San Augustine County.
-
Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on -
LI, the flowing pressure (9500 psi) indicates EnCana is being conservative in the production rate and the well should not suffer the same fate as the Kardell well.
-
Permalink Reply by ken hatcher on
-
I will be happy when No. Sabine uncorks a good one! If it's there it should be in the southern part of T-7 in Sabine parish. Hey, San Augustine deserves some good lease terms...this should help.
-
-
Ken, you may hear before we do. Isn't Forest drilling in 7-7-13 or is that not the correct Twp. for the Olympia Minerals 7 H #1, 241002?
-
Permalink Reply by ken hatcher on
-
That and the James Lime Devon is going to do.
-
-
-
That's fine, LI. I just get tired of you posting about how bad the Kardell well is... every chance you get. We all know that it is not living up to expectations. And, I suspect that there is an underlying cause that we are not fully aware of. Devon does not tell all.
Have you researched all the 20+ IPs in NW La. to make sure you don't have one over there that has done the same thing? I bet not. -
-
Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on
-
Ken, Sabine Parish already has three good ones (20 to 21 MMcfd). I know - you are looking for that 40 MMcfd "golden" well.
-
Permalink Reply by ken hatcher on
-
Oh no Les...just a little concerned it might falter before it gets to the southend of T-7...I have a good bit of under water acreage there... just have to wait and see, any kind of a producing well in that area would be great!
-
Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com
Top Content
Blog Posts
The Lithium Connection to Shale Drilling
Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…
ContinuePosted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40
Not a member? Get our email.
Groups
-
San Augustine, TX
386 members
-
Miller County, Arkansas
27 members
-
Sabine Parish, LA
455 members
-
South Caddo Parish Group
440 members
-
Natchitoches Parish
400 members
-
Bienville Parish, LA
244 members
-
Fayetteville Shale
149 members
-
North Caddo Parish
358 members
-
Central Texas Gas
63 members
-
Cass County, TX
119 members
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
