Food versus fuel..Rising grain costs show folly of continuing federal ethanol subsidies

"There are many justified federal energy subsidies, but corn ethanol isn't one of them. A country with massive shale gas reserves like the United States should be focused on stimulating technological innovations to use it for transportation."

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/editorial/7287368.html

Views: 30

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 22, 2010 at 13:12
I read the other day that almost all of Brazil's sugar crop will be used in the production of ethanol... Midwesterners fell in love with this idea, but its the lousiest thing I have ever heard of.
Permalink Reply by The_Baron on November 23, 2010 at 6:05
at least making ethanol w/cane makes sense. Best estimate I have seen shows ethanol from corn produces 1.3 BTUs/per BTU in, while sugar can is 8:1. Cellose, which is not yet been successfully scaled up from a lab could as much as 32:1.
Permalink Reply by Pipeliner on November 23, 2010 at 6:32
Gore Admits He Was Wrong About Ethanol Subsidies: ‘Not Good Policy’

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/gore-admits-he-was-wrong-about-etha...
Permalink Reply by P.G. on November 23, 2010 at 7:30
It's been good for Monsanto!
Just like that Food Safety bill will be!

Neither are good for the consumers though...
Permalink Reply by Robert Duke on November 23, 2010 at 8:47
Yes, total special-interest motivated folly! Like The Baron says, cane sugar apparently at least makes "environmental" sense, in that the renewable energy yield is not bad; with corn, you really have to question a practice that gives you very little net renewable energy yield and drives prices on a critical food resource through the roof.
Permalink Reply by P.G. on November 24, 2010 at 2:38
The purpose was to help free the US from imported oil.
Seems like it would be a better investment or use of our tax dollars to put all the subsidy money into building access to Natural Gas for vehicles. Of course that would upset Monsanto though, huh?

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Top Content 

1 Looking Back At The Haynesville Shale - A Retrospective

Looking Back At The Haynesville Shale - A Retrospective
2 Pending Public Oil and Gas Hearings

Pending Public Oil and Gas Hearings
3 Arkansas Smackover Lithium Play

Arkansas Smackover Lithium Play
4 Comstock October Presentation

Comstock October Presentation
5 Aethon looks for Buyers of its Haynesville Assets

Aethon looks for Buyers of its Haynesville Assets
6 Notice Emails Are Back! Please review how they work.

Notice Emails Are Back! Please review how they work.
7 Arkansas O&G Commission unanimously denies royalty rate application for lithium extraction

Arkansas O&G Commission unanimously denies royalty rate application for lithium extraction

Blog Posts

The Lithium Connection to Shale Drilling

Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…

Continue

Posted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service