Gee, this is from Bloomberg Business Week. Actually, common sense because lots of grant funded research is done to prove someone's point (or disprove) Quite a long article with many comments.
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-07-23/frackers-fund-universit...
PS: our current favorite article about groups manipulating science to prove their point is in many more newspapers today! The contrast between these two articles is amazing. Or, do they mostly agree???
http://www.gohaynesvilleshale.com/forum/topics/fracking-critics-usi...
Tags:
Permalink Reply by dbob on July 23, 2012 at 12:29    The article indicating both sides mis-use science is more rational and spot on. This article attempts to insinuate something sinister based on the funding source. Government funded academics disagree every day, Pharmaceutical studies are largely paid for by industry.
7 members
8 members
7 members
386 members
402 members
248 members
441 members
690 members
455 members
194 members
In researching the decades-old Tuscaloosa Trend and the immense wealth it has generated for many, I find it deeply troubling that this resource-rich formation runs directly beneath one of the poorest communities in North Baton Rouge—near…
ContinuePosted by Char on May 29, 2025 at 14:42 — 4 Comments
    © 2025               Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).             
    Powered by
    
    
| h2 | h2 | h2 | 
|---|---|---|
AboutAs exciting as this is, we know that we have a responsibility to do this thing correctly. After all, we want the farm to remain a place where the family can gather for another 80 years and beyond. This site was born out of these desires. Before we started this site, googling "shale' brought up little information. Certainly nothing that was useful as we negotiated a lease. Read More  | 
Links | 
Copyright © 2017 GoHaynesvilleShale.com