I hope everyone watched GASLAND on HBO. rerunning all the time and also on demand. It's time to learn the consequences of the money you are making.

Tags: GASland, HBO:

Views: 404

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Replies to This Discussion

the beef is all up in your grill, and you still can't smell what the rock is cooking.

i believe you believe psuedoscientific american is entirely credible, but all you're doing is helping give credence to left wing scare tactics. where is the right wing propaganda? let's see you argue with the experts about any of the information from websites like energyindepth.org.

you do know unscientific american has a couple of far more recent articles about this subject, whey didn't you post them instead of something that's already 2 years old? furthermore, didn't they play a role in helping to fear monger nuclear power into submission? how about something more contemporary, does the name bjorn lomberg ring any bells? ... or maybe climategate? oops.

that rag started leaning left in the early 80's and it's only gotten "progressively" worse, they do a convincing hatchet job i admit, but if this is the best you can come up with i dunno what to tell you.

for the life of me i can't understand why you don't seem to ever understand any of the points i try to make with you, so i consulted "chomskybot," who advised me thus:

"For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any interest, most of the methodological work in modern linguistics is not to be considered in determining a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity has been defined by the paired utterance test. By combining adjunctions and certain deformations, the theory of syntactic features developed earlier may remedy and, at the same time, eliminate the system of base rules exclusive of the lexicon. Clearly, the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial is unspecified with respect to an abstract underlying order."

ahhh it's all so crystal clear to me now, thanks chomskybot.

and nite nite sesport, magic 8-ball says we'll talk in arrogant tones more tomorrow.
Let's see ... I posted a law review, industry came back with their own link (I did look to see who the advertising sponsors are), I came back with a periodical piece. Hmmmm, I believe it's industries turn to balance.

So, in your own words, can you explain to the Everyday Joe's what Chomsky is talking about? lol

Good morning to you, good morning to you.
We're all in our places,
With sunshiny faces ....

well first of all, the truth is verifiable, doesn't matter where it comes from. the "industry" doesn't have to rebut because you've provided nothing substantive to bother with.

second of all, that's not chomsky, it's chomskybot, and it's a bunch of gibberish, but i wouldn't expect you to be able to differentiate that from something which actually makes sense.

notice how you're the only one still posting? quite frankly, you're one of the most amazing trolls i've ever met on the interwebs, you refuse to be embarrassed into going away or changing your handle, so congratulations i guess.

maybe you like the attention? i'd recommend a pet cat or something. meows.


© 2023   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service