Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by North LA on February 2, 2009 at 6:50

They could open a whole new play on accident :) I guess we'll just have to wait and see. Thanks for the information.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on February 2, 2009 at 16:46

North LA, the O&G companies have previously discussed the Bossier Shale being immediately above the Haynesville Shale. It has much lower production potential and is viewed as a secondary development target after the Haynesville Shale in Louisiana. In Texas it has higher potential and is the primary target due to the thinning of the Haynesville Shale.

Permalink Reply by Two Dogs, Pirate on February 2, 2009 at 8:14

Nothing is insane in the O&G fields.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by North LA on February 2, 2009 at 16:43

Yeah 2 dogs but the O&G companies keep creeping up on 100mmcfd. Even if you do have 80% decline the first year and 50% the next year the plateu of the curve at 10mmcfd for 20 years would be really nice.

Don't worry I'm not getting my hopes up. Just dreaming a little. I'm very realistic about all of this and understand that it could go away just as quickly as it came in.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by redrivergal on February 2, 2009 at 7:45

Joe Hahn,
You seem well versed in well activity in Red River Parish. We're glad and appreciate your help. Just making sure I understand--do the figures above (60 mcf, etc) refer to the Colbert Timberlands well in the Martin field of RRP, # 238108 (in 16-13-9)? What figures have you (or anyone else) heard about the Haynesville Bundrick well at Westdale? It is also in RRP (#238107) in 35-14-11. Thanks again.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Joe Hahn on February 2, 2009 at 7:57

No the 60 MCF refers to the Bundrick well and you are correct it is #238107.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by redrivergal on February 2, 2009 at 8:09

Joe Hahn,
Thanks for your reply. Have you heard anything in the past few days about the Indigo Minerals well in RRP (10-13-9) # 238708? It is off Hwy 371 north of Coushatta. According to SONRISE 1/28/09, it is "waiting on completion". Are they fracing yet? The activity report on SONRISE says that "TD" was done on 1/20/09. Does "TD" stand for "take down" (the rig) date? I appreciate any information you may be able to provide.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Joe Hahn on February 2, 2009 at 8:25

They are not fracing there yet. They are currently fracing #238349 in RRP (029-13N-09W) J.W. Adcock Inv 29H. After that, it is my understanding they will frac #238485 in RRP (033-13N-09W) Elmwood Land Co. Haven't heard anything on Indigo yet.

Permalink Reply by George James on February 2, 2009 at 11:28

Did this well come in at 60 MMCFD or 60 MCF day.....60 MCF a day is only 60,000 a day...60MMCFD is 60 Million...please clarify!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by redrivergal on February 2, 2009 at 12:48

George James,
That was going to be another one of my questions to Joe Hahn. Great minds think alike. :-) Joe, how about it? For the Bundrick well at Westdale, 60 mcf or 60 mmcf? Also, on average, about how many days does it take to frac a well? Thanks a lot for everybody's help.

Permalink Reply by Joe Hahn on February 2, 2009 at 15:13

Sorry about that. 60MMCFD

Permalink Reply by Joe Hahn on February 2, 2009 at 18:30

Depends on how many stages and if any difficulty occurs. As I understand it they are beginning the 9th and final stage this pm on #238349 in RRP and are slated to complete through the night and they began last Wednesday. Had very few complications thus far.

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• Next ›
• Page