Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Concerned Lessor off HWY 21 on February 12, 2010 at 12:34

Thanks RBH, What's the deffernce between the production queries and the well logs which do not exisit yet for this well. Also, how accurate are these numbers? Are they givin by the operator at thier discresion or are they obtained directly from RRC field staff? Lastly, can you explain how 176,761 = 5.7 MMCF.

Permalink Reply by RBH on February 12, 2010 at 12:39

THESE ARE SUPPLIED AND SUBMITTED TO THE TEXAS RAILROAD COMMISSION BY THE OPERATOR SO I WOULD CONSIDER THEM CORRECT; WELLS LOGS ARE NOT PRODUCTION AND ARE RUN WHEN THE WELL IS DRILLED TO ASSIST IN EVALAUATING ALL OF THE POTENTIAL AND OPERATORS DO NOT HAVE SUBMIT THE LOGS TO THE TRRC FOR SEVERAL YEARS AFTER THE WELL IS DRILLED..IE THEY "TIGHT HOLE" THE INFORMATION AS LONG AS THEY CAN..

Permalink Reply by Concerned Lessor off HWY 21 on February 12, 2010 at 12:49

OK great, Thanks for all your info.

Still would like to understand the math/conversion factor of 176,761 = 5.7.

Permalink Reply by RBH on February 12, 2010 at 12:50

FOR THE KARDELL #1h FOR THE MONTH OF OCTOBER 2009--REPORTED BY DEVON=176,761 MCF PRODUCED FOR THE MONTH AND = THE AVERAGE 5.7 MMCF/DAY (THIS WAS THE WELL WITH THE TEST RATES RELEASED OF 30 MMCF/DAY)

Permalink Reply by Concerned Lessor off HWY 21 on February 12, 2010 at 13:02

yeah and that was reported in November so to have been producing so low in October makes you wonder?? Also, Crimson has mentiond periods of up to 22 mmcfd. How much decline curve would you quess is involved here or could this be a choke situation?

Permalink Reply by ALongview on February 12, 2010 at 13:24

Maybe the well had damage? It didn't stop them from permitting two more right down highway 21 or from planning100 wells in the next 2 years so it couldn't have been something they didn't think they could deal with on future wells.

Permalink Reply by Benedumtreesoilwell on February 27, 2010 at 11:12

Thats part of the reason they drilled the new holes is because the formation collapsed on the K#1. We are preparing wells on the Subblet survey and Chummley survey. CR127 East of San Augustine. Thats the devon hot spot at the moment.

Permalink Reply by Benedumtreesoilwell on February 27, 2010 at 11:08

The Kardell was damaged because of the high flow rate. All i can say.

Permalink Reply by RBH on February 27, 2010 at 13:16

WilliamS..thanks for your comments; Risky play still in the learning curve stages with uncertain gas prices and never a "sure thing"

Permalink Reply by JWC on February 27, 2010 at 13:48

WilliamS I believe Devon was trying to put a unit together down 705 South of 103 at one time. I believe they pulled out. Guess they couldn't get it together. Thanks for your input.

Permalink Reply by Benedumtreesoilwell on February 27, 2010 at 14:02

How long ago was the 705 unit discussed?

Permalink Reply by JWC on February 27, 2010 at 14:15

That was early December I believe.

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• 7
• Next ›
• Page