So heavy handed and dumb!

Ohio Oil and Gas Land Management Commission must remove deceptive letters from its website

Aug 21, 2024 | By Guest Author

By Cathy Cowan Becker, Jess Grim, Mary Huck, Jenny Morgan, Anne Sparks, and Melinda Zemper

Excerpt, link to full article:  https://www.newsfromthestates.com/article/ohio-oil-and-gas-land-man...

Last September, reporter Jake Zuckerman of Cleveland.com broke the story that dozens of Ohioans whose names were on public comments in support of fracking Ohio state parks and public lands had never submitted those comments.

Within days, the count of people who said they had not submitted pro-fracking letters that bore their names reached almost 150, and Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost vowed to investigate.

Save Ohio Parks volunteers were instrumental in identifying over 100 of the people whose names appeared on public comments they had not submitted to the Oil and Gas Land Management Commission — the body tasked with deciding whether to approve or deny fracking of Ohio state parks, wildlife areas, and other public lands.

Suspicious comments

Save Ohio Parks first noticed anomalies with 1,100 pro-fracking comments last summer, shortly after they were posted on the commission’s website. The comments were written in industry parlance, not how a normal person speaks. They all had the same subject line, “Secure Ohio’s Energy Future,” and were identical except for the names, street addresses, phone numbers, and email addresses at the bottom.

But the kicker was, the 1,100 comments were submitted in five batches, with each batch of hundreds of letters bearing a time stamp in the exact same minute. No matter what issue is open for public comment, it is highly unlikely that hundreds of people would submit identical comments in the same minute.

We learned these letters were submitted by Consumer Energy Alliance (CEA), an oil and gas public relations firm based in Houston. CEA had gathered the personal information of Ohioans for an unrelated purpose, then attached this information to public comments supposedly in favor of fracking our state parks, which CEA then submitted to the state commission.

CEA has a track record of using citizens’ personal information without their consent on pro-fossil fuel public comments in several states, including previously in Ohio in 2016.

Save Ohio Parks brought our findings to the commission chair and asked her to remove these deceptive letters from the commission website. She declined. Instead she told us to contact the attorney general.

Views: 171

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

"This" is common practice by PR firms that work in the O&G space.  Most are not this brazen or lacking in professional ability.  They also promote things like a $10,000 dollar donation to an entity with high public regard such as the Shriner's Cripple Children's Hospital or the local volunteer fire department. Do not be fooled!  The benefits that O&G companies expect to receive when they pay a PR firm far out weigh what the community will get in return.

New FTC rule bans fake business reviews

Chief: Measure protects Americans from cheaters



With a unanimous 5-0 vote last week, the Federal Trade Commission approved a new ban on businesses that prohibits the use of fake reviews and testimonials.

The rule will become effective 60 days after the date it is published in the Federal Register, the agency said.

On Aug. 15, the FTC announced the new rule, which allows the agency to deter AI-generated fake reviews and enforce civil penalties against violators who knowingly sell or purchase such content.

“Fake reviews not only waste people’s time and money, but also pollute the marketplace and divert business away from honest competitors,” said FTC Chair Lina M. Khan. “By strengthening the FTC’s toolkit to fight deceptive advertising, the final rule will protect Americans from getting cheated, put businesses that unlawfully game the system on notice and promote markets that are fair, honest and competitive.”

A sampling of what the rule does:

Reviews and testimonials that misrepresent that they are created by someone who does not exist, such as AIgenerated content; by someone who does not have real experience with the business, its products, or its services; or misrepresent the experience of the person authoring the review or testimonial, are prohibited.

Businesses cannot provide compensation or other incentives in exchange for writing customer reviews that express a particular opinion, positive or negative. Certain reviews and testimonials written by company insiders that fail to “clearly and conspicuously”disclose the author’s business ties are prohibited, such as those given by officers or managers.

For consumers who are frustrated by negative reviews being removed from business pages or fake social media status being presented online, the FTC also included coverage for those issues:

Businesses cannot state that reviews on their website represent all or most of the reviews submitted if reviews have been suppressed based on their ratings or negative sentiments.

Google is backing a plan by the Federal Trade Commission to curb fake reviews online, a rare endorsement by the tech giant of the agency’s aggressive enforcement stance under Chair Lina Khan.

The company — which fields millions of reviews annually across its search engine, app store and other products — has faced pressure alongside rivals like Yelp and Amazon to crack down on misleading submissions that dupe consumers into buying goods and services online.

Now Google is speaking out in support of a new FTC rule that will allow enforcers to punish businesses that create phony or misleading reviews, joining the likes of Yelp.

https://sli.washingtonpost.com/imp?s=875968&li=technology202&m=11aa23d8bbf4b23d2da5cc551161a105&p=66c73c0554e7751dec20e564&stpe=static" border="0" style="max-height: 12px;" class="CToWUd"/>

“Fundamentally, we can’t provide our service if we’re not doing so in a safe and credible way … and so having the benefit of an agency codification of what good behavior looks like is really helpful for us in that mission,” Google General Counsel Halimah DeLaine Prado told the Tech Brief.

The rule was finalized last week and set to take effect in October. It would prohibit online reviews and firsthand accounts that falsely claim to have been written by a real person, including AI-generated posts, as well as those that misrepresent the experiences of the person sharing it. It would also bar businesses from purchasing or suppressing reviews by consumers, positive or negative.

Khan, a Democrat, said in a statement last week that the plan “will protect Americans from getting cheated, put businesses that unlawfully game the system on notice, and promote markets that are fair, honest, and competitive.”

By implementing the rule, the FTC will more easily be able to issue fines against violators, a key enforcement tool that has been weakened by recent court rulings.

Google has previously reported removing tens of millions of reviews for violating its policies and has filed lawsuits against “bad actors” who allegedly sought to deceive consumers. Last year, the Alphabet unit voiced support for the FTC using civil penalties to “further deter bad actors.”

DeLaine Prado said fake review submissions are a “rapidly building problem,” adding that Google has worked to “beat that back.” The FTC rule, she said, would “further bolster” industry efforts.

Yelp, another high-profile source of consumer reviews online, has also embraced the FTC’s push. Aaron Schur, Yelp’s general counsel, said in a statement that the rule “will improve the review landscape for consumers and help level the playing field for businesses.” Amazon said it was reviewing the final rule. (Amazon founder Jeff Bezos owns The Washington Post.)

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Blog Posts

The Lithium Connection to Shale Drilling

Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…

Continue

Posted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service