sec.32 15n 09w. Partial release of mineral leases

I received notice that Questar is relinquishing rights greater than 100ft. below the base of the haynesville shale as found at the Golson 32H #1. Any idea why?

Views: 61

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion


Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by HBP on April 8, 2009 at 1:42
Well Jim, Why?

Why proactively do anything in this case? That's not a business decision. Unless there are specific requests from a majority in a section to release these rights. Even then, why release everyone? Im not saying its possible, I'm just saying that I feel there is another reason here.

No business with shareholders proactively divests an asset for free.

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Two Dogs, Pirate on April 8, 2009 at 3:56
Probably most of the leases had a vertical Pugh Clause, so Questar is just doing the right thing and making the release public.

RSS

📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Click Forum and scroll down past the last discussion and click the "Follow" button.

Top Content 

1 Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map

Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map
2 More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs

More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs
3 Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5

Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5
4 Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high

Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high
5 Rockcliff III Counters Haynesville Inventory Concerns with Shelby Trough Push

Rockcliff III Counters Haynesville Inventory Concerns with Shelby Trough Push
6 Request For Assistance

Request For Assistance
7 The Curious Case of SAMSON CONTOUR

The Curious Case of SAMSON CONTOUR

Groups

© 2026   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service