Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Spring Branch,mineral owner on February 18, 2019 at 8:50

Thanks, Jay.  I see the Stewart and Bergold wells are in 1N-6E.   The Quarterly Activities Report lists the Sections, but not the Townships and Ranges that I can see.  I'm guessing the Taylor and Williams wells are also in 1N-6E and that the Saxby and Quinn wells are either in 1N-5E or 2N-5E.  Just can't tell for sure.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Spring Branch,mineral owner on February 18, 2019 at 9:29

That's what I've been told!!!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Spring Branch,mineral owner on February 18, 2019 at 9:29

I'm hoping one of the locals can help me!!!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on February 18, 2019 at 13:11

Both the Taylor 27H and the Williams 26H have surface locations in section 27 - 1N - 5E.  Saxby 3-10 and Quinn 41-30 are in section 3 - 1N - 4E. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on February 18, 2019 at 13:31

Hmmmm.  I thought the first well was encouraging not only from an IP standpoint but from the well cost.  I think it was $10.3M.

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on February 19, 2019 at 5:20

So, back to the issue of clay content that Goodrich sought to dismiss.

• ▶ Reply