Permalink Reply by Bradley McWilliams on April 26, 2014 at 2:19 Interesting stuff. I see the permit is on yesterday's list from the AOGC, listed under a company called C6. C6 also has a permit in Union Co. for a Smackover well.
What's really interesting is that Wieser-Brown has a permit for Nevada Co. for a Fayetteville well. Must be planning a really long extended reach lateral...
C6 is drilling ahead at 3660'.
Permalink Reply by Bradley McWilliams on May 25, 2014 at 3:24 Is this the Haynesville, or the LSBD?
The application is for a vertical Haynesville with the possibility of a horizontal in the future.
Permalink Reply by Joe Deerhunter on May 28, 2014 at 4:21 Is C6 the same as Cypress Operating? We recently leased a few mineral acres in Columbia for the "North Kerlin Prospect", going down to top of Smackover formation. It seems they were a smaller outfit anxious to proceed.
Joe, I don't think they are. While they are both out of Shreveport, they have different addresses.
There are a lot of Pettit wells being drilled in your area. Do you mind disclosing who leased your acreage?
Joe, here are some new Pettet permits in the Kerlin field.
Permalink Reply by W. Marshall Shaw on May 30, 2014 at 4:32 We have a substantial interest in the Buckner field, a smaller land ownership south of Magnolia (subject to a brine lease to Albemarle) and teeny-tiny interests in the old El Dorado field. We own a spot more royalties scattered around East Haynesville and a small parcel of land in Lillie. As a hillbilly who has no intention of moving to Hollywood, I am following this with interest but no extravagant expectations. I enjoy the posts. Thanks for the info.
The report now says "Drilling ahead" but "Correct spud date on 5/30/14"
Permalink Reply by obed w odom on August 24, 2014 at 3:44 This well, the Garrett 1-2, serial # 47255, was completed on 7/18/14 to produce 47 barrels of 46 gravity oil and 254 MCF gas, according to the current (8/22/2014) AOGC permit/completion report.Perforations are in the Haynesville from 10830 to 10909 feet.
Permalink Reply by Bradley McWilliams on August 28, 2014 at 16:13 I'm no expert, but I find this interesting. First, I didn't think the Haynesville was prospective in AR. Second, I thought the H'ville was dry gas only. 47 bbl and 250M gas isn't great, but for a vertical well, seems interesting.
Anyone out there that knows have any insight for us?
Permalink Reply by obed w odom on August 28, 2014 at 17:15 bpm,
Along the AR/LA state line the Haynesville formation is not shale as it is farther south, but sandstone, and this sandstone formation has been producing both oil and gas since at least 1921, when the town of Haynesville, LA, had its oil boom.
441 members
248 members
690 members
455 members
7 members
6 members
7 members
386 members
402 members
194 members
In researching the decades-old Tuscaloosa Trend and the immense wealth it has generated for many, I find it deeply troubling that this resource-rich formation runs directly beneath one of the poorest communities in North Baton Rouge—near…
ContinuePosted by Char on May 29, 2025 at 14:42 — 4 Comments
© 2025 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
| h2 | h2 | h2 |
|---|---|---|
AboutAs exciting as this is, we know that we have a responsibility to do this thing correctly. After all, we want the farm to remain a place where the family can gather for another 80 years and beyond. This site was born out of these desires. Before we started this site, googling "shale' brought up little information. Certainly nothing that was useful as we negotiated a lease. Read More |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoHaynesvilleShale.com