Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by JR in VA on September 21, 2013 at 11:05

FYI: per EOG division orders for the Phelps Unit the following landowners have not been reached and should contact EOG:

William Paul Whitton
Kerry King Whitton
Lisa Diane Whiteside
Carol McKinley Whiteside
Wesley Holt
Mary Kay Squyres Moss

Permalink Reply by Bill R on October 18, 2013 at 16:23

Finally got Royalty payments on Phelps and Chinaberry.... nothing from Alexander yet... anyone getting anything on Alexander yet?

Permalink Reply by Ron C on October 26, 2013 at 4:44

Bill - My family has royalty interest in the Alexander Unit. My mother received a document a month ago requesting SS# and signature from EOG. Can only assume that was the D.O. since I didn't see it. No check yet.  I guess EOG has had difficulty contacting and settling with all the parties involved.

Permalink Reply by JWD on November 6, 2013 at 9:48

Speaking of the Chinaberry.  I have been able to get production reports up until this month.  Have been using Pending, District 6, 740653.  This month I got this message. 

Message #1011: No Matching Results Any ideas??

Permalink Reply by jffree1 on November 6, 2013 at 10:44

The data has been migrated to the Lease ID #270453.

Permalink Reply by JWD on November 6, 2013 at 11:06

Thanks

Permalink Reply by JR in VA on October 5, 2013 at 3:33

Could someone help me out with information...I am trying to find out more about the McSwain well which is adjacent to the Phelps well.  I am having trouble locating a lease id and any production numbers.

It looks like there was some sort of snag in the drilling permit process, but I'm not sure what happened. 

 

Thanks in advance,

JR

Permalink Reply by George Smith on October 5, 2013 at 11:03

As I recall from looking at RRC site several months ago they withdrew the drilling permit application for McSwain shortly after filing the initial app

Permalink Reply by jffree1 on October 5, 2013 at 12:14

If you are referring to the James Lime well EOG permitted, it was approved back in November. It does have a 'no-perf' zone in the lateral and they applied for an exception to SWR rule 37 so they could have the NPZ removed. That application was rejected so the NPZ is still in place. The well has not been drilled.

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• Next ›
• Page