Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Cheerleader on March 4, 2010 at 22:28

Thanks again jffree and AC 123

landownerPermalink Reply by adubu on March 4, 2010 at 16:41

iffreel--please ID the Martinsville #1H well on the NW San Augustine ipg-- operator,etc

Permalink Reply by RBH on March 5, 2010 at 8:05

MARATHON MARTINSVILLE #1h

Attachments:

• MARATHON MARTINSVILLE #1H-SHELBY COLUNTY.pdf, 64 KB

landownerPermalink Reply by adubu on March 4, 2010 at 16:46

jffreel---please ID the Martinsville #1H in the NW San Aug ipg--Thanks

Permalink Reply by jffree1 on March 4, 2010 at 16:59

adubu, that is Marathon Oil-Martinsville #1H, 419-31522, permitted 11-20-09 and spud 1-01-10 in Wildcat field to 17,500'.

landownerPermalink Reply by adubu on March 5, 2010 at 7:37

TY

landownerPermalink Reply by Janna on March 1, 2010 at 15:02

Is 200 ft good? how does it compare to other areas?? I you were to lease minerals in this area what would be a fair amount per acre??? What is very high pressure????

landownerPermalink Reply by j garrett on March 1, 2010 at 16:35

We need to wait on verified / reported well results in the area to be able to answer your lease question. Do you own minerals in the area? What survey?

landownerPermalink Reply by Janna on March 1, 2010 at 17:06

a spear 43

Permalink Reply by RBH on March 1, 2010 at 17:15

NOTICED THAT GOODRICH HAD THE EOG GAMMAGE IN THEIR INVESTOR PRESENTATION A COUPLE OF PRESENTATIONS BACK WITH THE WELL NAME LABELED ON IT. THEIR MOST RECENT PRESENTATION STILL SHOWS THE LOG IN THEIR CROSS SECTION PAGE 21 WITHOUT "EOG GAMMAGE" LABELED--IN THEIR 2-18-2010 PRESENTATION--SHOWS 175' FROM THE TOP OF POROSITY FOR HAYNESVILLE/BOSSIER IN THE GAMMAGE TO THE BOTTOM AT ~13075'=LOG DEPTH-CV LIME

Permalink Reply by Cheerleader on March 1, 2010 at 18:43

Our BFF oilvoice.com has reported on the thicknes of the shale in San Augustine. I can't find the exact date[s] but I remember the entry[s]
I am looking forward to Jffree1's Motherload Map!!

landownerPermalink Reply by reallyoldguy on March 1, 2010 at 23:07

j garrett: can this be confirmed?

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• Next ›
• Page