Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by jffree1 on October 30, 2011 at 3:05

FB, they reported the total flow for the entire test period (72 hours) so divide by three to get MMcfd.

Lobos 1H was re-reported to amend the completion report.  It was completed in January @ 11.176 MMcfd, 14/64 choke, 6300# FCP.

Permalink Reply by farmbrad on October 30, 2011 at 3:26

OK, so all reports will be for the 72 hr test period & need to be divided by three?  Also, why is the depth not aligned? And thanks, I knew you'd have a logical answer.

Permalink Reply by adubu on October 30, 2011 at 10:35

12,898  is  the Vertical depth--then the lateral leg (H) goes out about 6,000 ft to total length of hole 19,208------ about 12,900-13,000 is the vertical depth(bottom of formation) of the shale in this area so this well is a Haynesville rather than the upper or middle to lower  Bossier shale well.

Permalink Reply by jffree1 on October 30, 2011 at 12:22

FB, it looks like more than one person may have worked on that report.  For the most part they are reported correctly but once you get down to San Augustine and Nacogdoches they used the cumulative figure instead of the average daily.

Permalink Reply by farmbrad on October 31, 2011 at 11:50

Thanks ya'll, for the explanations. Anything looking suspicious on the ETDR will have to be verified through RRC Completions report I guess.

Permalink Reply by Joe Petro on November 6, 2011 at 1:59

The old Drilling Report format was always to report the 24 hour flow rate.  My guess is that reporting the 72 hour flow rate was a mistake since it was confusing, especially if the report did not explain that it was a 72 hour rate.  The new Drilling Report will likely iron out these types of kinks in the near future.  It would be a shame if the San Augustine and Nacogdoches reports used a different format from the other counties--ie, reporting cumulative figures rather than the average daily figures.  That would seem to be a step backward from easy to read standards.

Permalink Reply by Doob on November 1, 2011 at 14:49

where are you even finding the new report format?

Permalink Reply by farmbrad on November 2, 2011 at 23:59

Doob,

1. GOOGLE "East Texas Drilling Report"

2. Select "Tyler News Business" or something similiar

3. When it opens, the Top Story is generally the ETDR

4. Click on "Full Story" & check date when it opens (sometimes you'll get an earlier version)

I always check it Sunday mornings when it's released for the week. 

fb

Permalink Reply by shelbyco on November 4, 2011 at 4:45

Sorry to switch counties, but I thought it made sense to ask in the San Augustine forum in light of this discussion.  I am interested in the following well information from the same report.  The well is located in far southern Panola county.

Panola ................ Indigo Minerals LLC ......................... Lazarine GU2–1h .... Carthage (Cotton Valley).................. 9455............ 2.750 .......... 13290 Mcf .......... 11.7 Miles SW Carthage.

Does anyone know if the reference to "13290 Mcf" indicates flow rate for the entire test period also (4.43 Mcf per day)? 

 

Permalink Reply by adubu on November 4, 2011 at 5:56

yep the 13290 mcf is for 72 hours--3 days or avg 4430 mcf or 4.43 mmcf for one day--- this is a horizontal CV well

Permalink Reply by shelbyco on November 4, 2011 at 6:08

Thanks.  That is what I assumed.  Do you know where one would look to see what liquids were produced during the 72-hour period?  I recently leased some minerals pretty close to this well and am trying to get a handle on these horizontal CV wells.

Permalink Reply by jffree1 on November 4, 2011 at 6:24

Produced liquids (gas well) would be on a G-5 report, shelbyco.  That report is turned in with the G-1 IP report and would be a part of the completion packet.

http://webapps.rrc.state.tx.us/CMPL/publicSearchAction.do?formData....

 

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page