Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by charlie brown on November 30, 2009 at 17:32

Thank you Jay Bee
I am as smart as "a sack of hammers" on this and I can't understand what you guys are talking about either!
What do you mean IP on the H;1700' was open hole completion;
no segmental hydro frac out of ~4900' lateral so;
3200' hydro frac done on the well
Thank you also in advance

Permalink Reply by Etola on November 29, 2009 at 14:14

The news I got from RRC last week was that CHK had the Harvey on sales line sometime in mid-August and turned in the completion report on Nov 18. Will someone help me understand the numbers? Earlier someone said 20,879 mcf for the month of September. If the well was put on sales line in August that amount (20,879) would be for a full month, wouldn't it? I realize 3.162mcf is the potential and probably not what is put through the line, but do these numbers add up to what was reported for Sept. monthly production? Please explain the difference between mmcfd and mcf.

Permalink Reply by Laurie Grimmett on December 27, 2009 at 2:51

Need info about this well. For some reason no one can answer any questions. I have emailed Chesapeake and they replied and when i asked about the Harvey #1 well they never replied. Can anyone please give me info about this well. W.P. Harvey is the name of the lease, located in the Toledo Bend Reservoir. I just dont understand why everything is so hush hush.

Permalink Reply by jffree1 on December 28, 2009 at 7:20

Laurie, the last info I have on Harvey #1H was an IP of 3.162 Million cubic feet per day in the East Texas Drilling Report on 11-29-09. It was completed in the "Wildcat" field and it does not appear to have an allowable yet, or a change to a producing field, which is required before they can send the gas to sales. And since there is no lease ID # yet (goes with allowable) there is no production reported.

Permalink Reply by Laurie Grimmett on December 29, 2009 at 1:37

Thanks very much, do u know anything about why there is no P-12 on the permit. My family has mineral rights to 165 acres and i was trying to figure out if this well was on the property. Thanks, you have been more helpful than Chespeake.

Permalink Reply by jffree1 on December 29, 2009 at 3:57

Harvey 1H shows to be a non-unitized well which is why there is no P-12 on the permit.

Permalink Reply by jffree1 on December 29, 2009 at 4:06

Laurie G, W.P. (P.W. on GIS map) Harvey is the survey name. Both Harvey surveys have portions that are "in Toledo Bend Reservoir" but neither survey has a well in it at this time.

Permalink Reply by Laurie Grimmett on December 29, 2009 at 22:50

Thanks for the info. The landman called about 3 mos ago to verify our lease. When i spoke to him he said there was activity but he could not tell what was going on. We signed our lease in June '08. Seems like something should be going on by now. The gentleman that came with our lease and check said Nov. or Dec. I need all the info you can get on our lease. Thanks jffree for all your info and help. You have been more help than Chesapeake

Permalink Reply by RBH on December 30, 2009 at 14:24

Laurie

check leases filed of record and unit declarations:

www.countyrecords.com

Permalink Reply by adubu on December 30, 2009 at 1:19

Laurie---suggest you go to RRC look at drilling permit again and download the drill site plat you should be able to see if your property is located within the unit. Let me know if this helps you

Permalink Reply by RBH on December 30, 2009 at 13:23

HARVEY #1h
PRODUCTION FOR SEPTEMBER
20,879 MCF
NOTHING SHOWN FOR OCTOBER 2009

Permalink Reply by jffree1 on December 30, 2009 at 14:10

RBH, I have not been able to find a lease ID# for Harvey 1H. Would you be so kind as to tell me what it is, since you have production numbers?

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• …
• 7
• 8
• 9
• 10
• 11
• Next ›
• Page