landowner

80 Choke

According to sonris the well in our section has been put on a 80 choke.
It was on a 20 choke.
There are 2 more wells within a mile of our section that have also been put on a 80 Choke.
It the 80 choke going to increase or decrease production?
Thanks for the info!

Views: 614

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion


landownerPermalink Reply by essay on December 13, 2009 at 15:25
the bigger the number the larger the aperture, hence more production.... care to share the serial numbers, i would like to look myself :)

landownerPermalink Reply by Granny on December 13, 2009 at 15:57
238702 I am looking at the well test.

landownerPermalink Reply by Bobi Carr ("parker") on December 13, 2009 at 16:30
I thought they only went up to 64 (?). 20/64 , 24/64 ,.... In these wells 64 would be fully open.

I wonder if they are using bigger pipe on this well.

landownerPermalink Reply by Bobi Carr ("parker") on December 13, 2009 at 16:41
Granny,

I looked at it on Sonris. The initial production was 20/64.

Gotta be a typo.

landownerPermalink Reply by Granny on December 13, 2009 at 16:45
Also look at 238613 & 23919, they show the same choke.
238702 & 238613 are on sections side by side.
Could be a typo on all 3?

landownerPermalink Reply by Carolyn on December 14, 2009 at 15:45
Could someone please explain these wells that are showing an 80 choke. It is strange that it is several wells in close proximity to each other. Could it be possible that they have changed these wells with larger pipes? If so, what would be the reason for that?

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Les Bamburg on December 14, 2009 at 18:30
EB, they may just be equipped with larger choke bodies that would allow a choke opening (80/64") larger than 1".

landownerPermalink Reply by kittycatmama on December 14, 2009 at 15:59
I looked at neighbor's well and it is now 13/64 choke. I assume that means they are contolling flow. It has gone from 13mcf day to 4mcfd. Am I understanding this correctly--that operator is intentionally slowing the gas flow?

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Les Bamburg on December 14, 2009 at 18:32
KCM, it is possible. Several operators have indicated their intent to restrict flows during this low price environment.

landownerPermalink Reply by essay on December 14, 2009 at 19:54
the info somebody posted from petrohawk? about smaller chokes producing more over a longer period just made sense to me, i think of it almost as an aerosol can, and how puncturing a big hole in it can blow the propellant out and leave a lot of the good stuff trapped. of course that is just my own simplistic understanding.

landownerPermalink Reply by kittycatmama on December 15, 2009 at 4:07
the wells near me are all Encana and all are on 13-19 chokes and reduced to 4mcfd and projected at that through June 2010

landownerPermalink Reply by Hunter Hillbilly DS3 on December 16, 2009 at 7:29
The choke on these wells #238702, 239119 & 238613 was put up to 80 and the estimated potential went down.
Any one have a guess as to what is going on?

RSS

📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Click Forum and scroll down past the last discussion and click the "Follow" button.

Top Content 

1 Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map

Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map
2 More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs

More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs
3 Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5

Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5
4 Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high

Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high
5 Rockcliff III Counters Haynesville Inventory Concerns with Shelby Trough Push

Rockcliff III Counters Haynesville Inventory Concerns with Shelby Trough Push
6 Request For Assistance

Request For Assistance
7 The Curious Case of SAMSON CONTOUR

The Curious Case of SAMSON CONTOUR

Groups

© 2026   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service