Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by lsauci2 on December 1, 2009 at 9:33

I received an application letter for Encana in the Trenton Field - JUR RA SUF APO 1199-C (R 13 W, R 12 W), looks like section 30 on the map they sent. Any activity going on there? The hearing was set on November 17th.

Permalink Reply by Henry on December 1, 2009 at 10:14

Linda,
This application was for Sec 30 of 11N, 12W. No permit to drill has been filed so far.

Permalink Reply by J B Nabors on December 14, 2009 at 20:28

Skip has given you good information.

However, you speak of a "pre-application notice". Does your notice state that "a conference will be held"? If so, the normal procedure is for the conference to be held, then a hearing date will be set. Depending on whether anyone attends the conference: a) if nobody requests or attends the pre-application conference, the hearing date may be set as soon as possible; b) if anyone formally requests the pre-application hearing conference, then the conference must be held, and the hearing date must be at least 30 days after the conference.

Oil companies can and do begin drilling activities on the day of the hearing. However, they are not obliged to, and may wait months (or even years) after the hearing and the application is approved.

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on December 15, 2009 at 12:39

Crunchy. Spudding a well interrupts prescription of a mineral servitude. It does not maintain a lease. I know the difference can be confusing for a lot of the members. Only production maintains a lease.

Permalink Reply by Crunchy on December 15, 2009 at 15:48

The clock is ticking then. Thanks.

Permalink Reply by Ouiser on December 17, 2009 at 8:21

My husband is reading me a letter over the phone we got today from attorneys representing Petrohawk. This is on Grogans Field, Sections: 12, 13, 14, 22, 23 and 24.

Permalink Reply by Henry on December 17, 2009 at 8:24

Ouiser -- Township and Range??? Thanks.

Permalink Reply by Ouiser on December 17, 2009 at 8:28

I'll have to check. I don't have the letter in front of me. Ours is 14 (WH Blair estate)

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on December 17, 2009 at 9:05

I'm bettin' 10N - 10W.

Permalink Reply by Henry on December 17, 2009 at 10:36

Skip, Me to.

Permalink Reply by Ouiser on December 17, 2009 at 12:35

Well guys I'm sorry but I need a lawyer to read the dang thing! The Map they attached though shows Grogan Field and part is "existing/pending Haynesville Sand Units and the other part "proposed Haynesville Zone, Reservoir A Sand Unit Z.
They are all Grogan field and at the top right of the map it has R 11 W - down the righ it says T 10 N. The parts marked I'm assuming sections since they all say 640 + acres are:
from left to right:
10, 11 and 12
15, 14, and 13
22, 23 and 24

Permalink Reply by Ouiser on December 17, 2009 at 12:49

Ok in very SMALL letter on the side that only a young person can read it says"

John_Grogan_14_10_11W.DWG

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• Next ›
• Page