Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Henry on December 30, 2009 at 3:09

I think I've just answered my question... RS 31:73 states: "A single mineral servitude may not be created on two or more noncontiguous tracts of land. "

Lazy me. I should've checked the MIneral Code first, before posting.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Buddy on December 30, 2009 at 3:11

Henry: You might want to investigate drilling a shallow well on those tracts which are about to prescribe if they are in the play.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by The_Baron on December 30, 2009 at 6:34

Henry,

first, Each is a seperate servitude if they are non contiguous.

Corners touching does not count. I would have to see the official description to be sure.

All that being said, lets call the tract drilled as tract "A". Tract A was as you stated, had a well drilled. The well was dry, but prescription was interupted on that tract. After operations were complete, prescription begins running again anew for a another 10 year period...NOT where it lefet of, but another ten year period
(unless otherwise provided for in your mineral reservation, but this is not normally the case). See my blog on prescription for more detailed info.

http://www.gohaynesvilleshale.com/profiles/blogs/prescription-and-m...
http://www.gohaynesvilleshale.com/profiles/blogs/prescription-and-m...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by The_Baron on December 30, 2009 at 6:35

§30. Date on which prescription interrupted and commenced anew

An interruption takes place on the date actual drilling or mining operations are commenced on the land burdened by the servitude or, as provided in Article 33, on a conventional or compulsory unit including all or a portion thereof. Preparations for the commencement of actual drilling or mining operations, such as geological or geophysical exploration, surveying, clearing of a site, and the hauling and erection of materials and structures necessary to conduct operations do not interrupt prescription. Prescription commences anew from the last day on which actual drilling or mining operations are conducted.

Acts 1974, No. 50, §30, eff. Jan. 1, 1975.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Henry on December 30, 2009 at 9:46

Baron,
Thanks. Now, a dumber question from me.... Let's say I reserved all minerals in a sale. And after 5 years, someone drills a dry gas well. Is a new servitude for ALL minerals created (e.g., coal, gold, silver, etc) or just for gas?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by The_Baron on December 31, 2009 at 4:05

Yes harold, the effect of wells pooled with the land can be different. My blog disscusses these rules.

The language of the servitude is important, but the mineral code is the final athority:

§73. Single servitude may not exist on noncontiguous tracts

A single mineral servitude may not be created on two or more noncontiguous tracts of land.

Acts 1974, No. 50, §73, eff. Jan. 1, 1975.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mac Davis on December 30, 2009 at 12:01

I think there are considerably different rules for Oil and gas vs. coal, gold, iron ore, etc.

Something to do with it flowing vs. being dug out.

Louisiana law, fuzzy recollection.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Henry on December 30, 2009 at 12:17

Mac,
Thanks. I kind of figured my question was dumb.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bobi Carr ("parker") on December 30, 2009 at 14:16

Henry,

Not a dumb question at all. It brings up interesting things to ponder.

Thanks

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by The_Baron on December 31, 2009 at 4:01

From the mineral code:

§5. Ownership of solid minerals

Ownership of land includes all minerals occurring naturally in a solid state. Solid minerals are insusceptible of ownership apart from the land until reduced to possession.

Acts 1974, No. 50, §1, eff. Jan. 1, 1975.




I can say that a gas well interupts for oil and gas mineral rights.

• ▶ Reply