landowner

Lane #2...?

I know that a few people have asked in other discussions, but does anyone have any information about Lane #2? Thanks...we, around that area are really looking forward to some information on how that well is producing. I would appreciate any information.

Views: 295

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Miracle on January 16, 2010 at 6:16
Laurie -- they are still drilling on this well -- sounded like they were jarring on DP last Sunday which doesn't sound too good for them. Will need to go by really slow when I get a chance to see what they are doing. I wonder why they are using the road Samson built to get to the Larcie #1?
Permalink Reply by RBH on January 13, 2010 at 11:05
Permalink Reply by RBH on January 16, 2010 at 9:23
still showing up on Baker Hughes Rig Count site 1/15/2010

landownerPermalink Reply by Laurie on January 25, 2010 at 14:53
Are there any updates? Anyone???
Permalink Reply by jffree1 on January 25, 2010 at 15:05
It still shows as drilling, Laurie.

landownerPermalink Reply by Laurie on February 2, 2010 at 23:54
Do you or anyone happen to know the update on this well?
Permalink Reply by jffree1 on February 3, 2010 at 4:43
Laurie, when Baker Hughes shows that the rig is gone I'll be sure to post it. I know you are waiting anxiously. Keep in mind, once the rig is gone it may take quite awhile before we know what the results are.

landownerPermalink Reply by Laurie on February 3, 2010 at 7:10
Okay thanks, I will wait for your update....Laurie
Permalink Reply by daddy bill on February 4, 2010 at 4:02
Laurie:
The Lane #2 had serious "hole problems" and the operator, after lengthy fishing operations is abandoning the hole. However it is my understanding they plan to drill a number 2-A well from the same location, utilizing the surface pipe and setting 75/8" intermediate casing to 5500'. Don't give up.

Daddy Bill
Permalink Reply by jffree1 on February 4, 2010 at 4:07
I suspected they were having problems after being there for so long. I just didn't want to be the "messenger", not knowing anything for certain. Better luck on the next attempt!
Permalink Reply by jffree1 on February 4, 2010 at 11:19
They applied for a permit for the sidetrack today.
Permalink Reply by RBH on February 4, 2010 at 11:41
IN TRRC NEW PERMIT IN REMARKS SECTION with new plat 2-4-2010 for Lane #2:
"Operator remark: Amended permit to show correct surface location after conductor set. Amend permit to show new bottom hole location due to side track, drill pipe stuck in hole from 6224-9579’ on original hole. Original TD when abandoned was 11,002’. "
it does not look like either Petrohawk's Lane #1H or Bowers #1H were either drilled with Horizontal section in looking at plat
Attachments:

RSS

© 2026   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service