Here is a thought provoking question. Would you sign a lease for 21% no cost, including no deducting the cost of treating, gathering, storing, transporting, separating, dehydrating, compressing, extracting, processing, manufacturing, marketing, improving, or any other cost, including risk charges, whether similar or dissimilar to those enumerated.
Or would you prefer a lease for 25% and the statement- Lessor shall bear none of the costs of production and shall not withheld from royalty payments
 
Won't really affect my lease as I have just signed it and insisted on the 21% even though the co offered and tried to give me the 25%. Just wondering what others would do, and this is a TMS lease if that would change your opinion.

 

Views: 96

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Can you say what area of the TMS and what company you just leased to? The best I have heard so far in the TMS is 1/5 royalty. thanks
25% less transportation,etc., costs will probable yield less than the 21% offer. check the deducts on someone's check stub. runs around 10% to 25%. do the math with actual figures!

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Blog Posts

Tuscaloosa Trend Sits On Top Of Poorest Neighbourhood For Decades - Yet No Royalties Ever Paid To The Community -- Why??

In researching the decades-old Tuscaloosa Trend and the immense wealth it has generated for many, I find it deeply troubling that this resource-rich formation runs directly beneath one of the poorest communities in North Baton Rouge—near Southern University, Louisiana—yet neither the university ( that I am aware of)  nor local residents appear to have received any compensation for the minerals extracted from their land.

This area has suffered immense environmental degradation…

Continue

Posted by Char on May 29, 2025 at 14:42

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2025   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service