Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on September 18, 2011 at 4:35

Order No. 1490-C-17

http://ucmwww.dnr.state.la.us/ucmsearch/UCMRedir.aspx?url=http%3a%2...

 

Order No. 1490-C.  See Finding No. 4, Page 2.

http://ucmwww.dnr.state.la.us/ucmsearch/UCMRedir.aspx?url=http%3a%2...

 

Owenson can you scan and upload the pre-conference version of  the new alternate unit well application in its entirety?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Owenson on September 18, 2011 at 5:30

Skip,

 

See attached.

Attachments:

• SCN_0003.pdf, 3.1 MB

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on September 18, 2011 at 5:39

Thanks.  The application for additional alternate unit wells is obviously in violation of Finding 4 in the initial order, 1490-C.  It will be interesting to see if the app makes it to the Commissioner's Public Hearing schedule.  With only ten days official notice required, we should know soon.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Owenson on September 18, 2011 at 5:33

WR,

Had not seen this before, thanks

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on September 18, 2011 at 8:08

Owenson, looks as though QEP plans to drill some wells on 40 acre spacing in Section 4 (and Section 9) to determine performance of downspacing.  They may also be drilling the wells into slightly different layers of the Haynesville Shale.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Owenson on September 22, 2011 at 12:43

Les B,

 

There are now 7 new permits into sec 4.

Looks like most are 12000 tvd

A couple are 11900 or so.

Does the TVD include the length of the directional bore to get over to the curve destination,

or is it the actual depth that the horizontal will begin or end?

 

Thanks,

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on October 11, 2011 at 6:03

Owenson, the TVD (True Vertical Depth) on the well permit represents the planned vertical depth of the well from the surface at the end of the lateral.  All seven wells have TVD's within 100 ft of each other.  Maybe QEP will eventually disclose their objective for these wells. 

 

Questar, Waites 4 #H1A Well, Serial #243808, S4-T15N-R10W
Questar, Waites 4 #H2A Well, Serial #243809, S4-T15N-R10W
Questar, Waites 4 #H3A Well, Serial #243810, S4-T15N-R10W
Questar, Walker 4 #H1A Well, Serial #243824, S4-T15N-R10W
Questar, Walker 4 #H2A Well, Serial #243825, S4-T15N-R10W
Questar, Walker 4 #H3A Well, Serial #243826, S4-T15N-R10W
Questar, Walker 4 #H4A Well, Serial #243827, S4-T15N-R10W

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by DrWAVeSport Cd1 on September 22, 2011 at 8:52

Owenson,

 

Bump.  Great discussion.   Please update asap.  

 

Thanks again from GHShalers.

 

DrWAVeSport Cd1 9/22/2011

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Owenson on October 11, 2011 at 4:09

Does anyone have an inside scoop on hearing orders?

The alternate wells that would be on 330' spacing were in an application heard on 10/4.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on October 11, 2011 at 4:42

There is no field order approving this application posted to the database.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Owenson on November 21, 2011 at 13:34

It appears that the state will allow closer spacing.  I see that Encana has drilled some wells on 40s previously.  See attached field order.  May be a while before it happens if QEP is going to go to two rigs.  Who can blame them with $3 gas.

Attachments:

• FOSec4.pdf, 110 KB

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on November 21, 2011 at 15:42

Owenson, see the following.

 

http://www.gohaynesvilleshale.com/forum/topics/qep-resources-analys...

 

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• Next ›
• Page