I just got an e-mail from the landman who leased my 280 acres for $200 per acre a year ago. They want me to sign a road r/w for $25 per rod (16.5) feet. I thought that they would throw me a bone because they ripped me off so much to begin with. I have read on this site the going rate is $200 per acre. So they are going to pay 1/8th of the going rate if I let them.
THIS IS FOR A ROAD TO ANOTHER SECTION. THEY AREN'T EVEN GOING TO PUT THE WELL IN MY SECTION.

He even had the audacity to tell me that it is in my lease for an access road. I have already explained to him my lease doesn't pertain to access another section where I don't own property.

PLEASE let me know if you have had any success dealing with this sort of thing or if you know someone who has.

Views: 159

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I want to address this small point: Do not assume that a contract field landman is privy to information about where a company may or may not drill. They simply have no idea. Its doubtful that his boss or his boss's boss has more than a rough guestimate.
They sent a plat showing they want to go through my property to get to the next section. I do not own property in the next section.
There have been rumors for months that they are going to go through my property to drill a well on someone elses property that is not in my section. I realize that could put it in the same unit. But this is not what the landman stated.
He said they are going to drill in the section next to my property and that my lease gives them the right to construct the roads, etc.
I DO NOT BELEIVE THEY CAN CONTRUCT ROAD ON MY PROPERTY TO GET TO ANOTHER PROPERTY WITHOUT PAYING MARKET PRICE FOR THIS RIGHT.
I did give them rights to construct roads, etc.
I interpret it to mean only for a well in my unit. Do you know whether or not this is how it is generally interpretted.
THANKS AGAIN
As a general rule, when you sign an OGL, it gives them the right to do the things they need to do to explore/extract the minerals. But its all within reason. Building a necessary road through your pecan orchard might be reasonable under most circumstances. Taking fresh water from your pond would be unreasonable whether you had surface water provisions in your lease or not. You are right in saying that giving someone a ROW across your land is a separate issue from the right to construct a road to make a well on a unit you are in. Think about it. You lease to Chesapeake, however St. Mary's, in the next section over, makes a well and wants to get a ROW across your property. Are you bound by your Chesapeake lease to not negotiate on this issue? Of course not. Ask around regarding the highest per rod figure in your area. Then tell the landman that you are not dealing with them until they pay that plus a premium.

Good Luck.
THANKS. That is my thought exactly.
I asked him "why don't you just go through his property? He said "we would have to cut timber".
My thoughts are "SOOOOOO". I don't think it is my problem. Of course, I was not so rude as to put it that way. I just stated that my lease does not give them the right to construct a road through my property to drill a well "for" someone else.

I just so happen to know about the wetland issue also.

I could be wrong but I DO NOT beleive my lease gives them this right.
Does anyone else know whether I could expect more that the $200 per rod?
Are you PCR?
Thanks Les B,
That is the sort of information that I am trying to acquire. I posted a question on all experts and got a figure of about $2500 per acre for timber damages. The more information I can gather the better prepared I will be. I know I will probably have to hire an attorney, but I would like to get as much info before then. I have a large tract of land BUT NO DEEP POCKETS. As I stated I didn't do very well during the Bonus stage. All of these issues affect us for a very long time and I want to make sure I dot by i's and cross by t's.
I am in a very similar situation. However, Chesapeake is using a pre-existing private road, which happens to be the dividing line between two sections. This road was built and has been maintained by the landowners who have homes and we all happen to live in the section that is not being drilled on yet. We are experiencing a great inconvenience with dust, mud, heavy traffic and loud noise. This road is only one lane wide. So unless we want to get run over by one of these big trucks, we must pull over and let them pass. Chesapeake's guy told me the same thing about my lease allowing them ingress and egress to any exploration. I have 20 acres and received only $100/acre in bonus money in 2006. I feel that we deserve compensation for the use of the road. Please keep me informed of anything you find out. I would greatly appreciate it.
I will let you know everything I find out.
Also look at Kassi's surface right agreements. Does anyone on the road have any health concerns that would make them blacktop the road.

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service