Hello, Columbia County!

Excuse the redundancy.  I apparently posted to the main page rather than this group.  So, I'lll repeat myself a bit here.  Some of you may recall that I have some family property near Atlanta, and additional bits and pieces of mineral rights,

I've been off the forum for a few years, but I still own some property and mineral rights in Columbia and Lafayette counties.  what prompts me to post (after the long spell of inactivity}, is that Albemarle sent me a lease offer for some rights I have over near Village.  Apparently I already have brine rights leased to Albemarle, or to Lanexess (Great Lakes),  On this particular 40 acre parcel, I have 7.5 net mineral acres.  I assume I have no surface rights in this spot.

What is different is that this lease offer is for incidental harvest of oil and gas encountered while developing a brine well.  Albemelse is offeriing $100 per acre, 3/16 royalty, for a three-year term.

my questions are:

Is this pretty standard these days in Columbia County?

Is it worth it to get lawyers involved over this small a holding?

Is it possible for the owner (me) to gain anything by calling Albemarle's land office and asking for more bonuss. royalty, or both?

Wishing you all well, try to keep cool!

Views: 347

Replies to This Discussion

Skip what do you advise? I had gotten an offer to lease for Brine a few years ago & didn't do anything with it.

I think it is premature to sign a brine lease.  And under no circumstance would I include O&G mineral rights in the same lease.  It will be some years before processing facilities will be in place and drilling commences in areas that appear economic for concentrations of lithium and volumes of brine water.  All the current lease forms, shared and discussed here on GHS, are the worse, most one sided lease forms I have ever seen.  Since it is so early in the Lithium Land Rush, I doubt that lessees are likely to negotiate for better terms. They want to get as many unsuspecting mineral owners as possible to agree to these terrible leases first.  As the time for actual production nears, we should have a much better idea of the mineral rights value and what lease terms are possible.  I suggest that waiting is the best policy.

Thanks! I've read through so many discussions & posts, I can't remember where I saw that you listed an Arkansas attorney that can help. Can you post that again please? 

I don't have an attorney to recommend for AR currently.  If it was me, I  would quiz some who work in Magnolia or Little Rock that have websites that list O&G/Minerals as areas of practice.

Thanks!

Agree with Skip that would be best to wait and that leases being offered are one sided, but what are your thoughts on waiting to the point where lessors get integrated into a brine unit? Appears likely the AOGC would then use a lease similar to what has been offered and there will be little to no chance of any changes in provisions when that happens. Also appears the financial benefits to lessor will be similar in either case because of AR state law setting the price of brine.

All good questions.....for an AR lawyer familiar with the existing regulations.  I'm also curious if anyone is lobbying the state for amendments to the brine regulations or new regulations all together now that the brine is known to contain a much more valuable component.  Lithium is a game changer.  One that AR mineral owners should be fairly compensated for.  The state regulators will likely do everything in their power to please the business investors.  I wouldn't expect the state to say no to anything ExxonMobil wants.

Columbia 1 used a phrase that captures my concern too: “lessors get integrated into a brine unit.”

I know folks around my land in Franklin County, TX, have signed. I know I’m not ready to sign— but surely much later in this game, a landowner could be surrounded by other who have signed, and drilling would begin. What happens to the unsigned when the brine is being pulled up anyway? I was told at some point that their part would go into escrow until terms had been agreed to, but what would be the company’s motivation at that point to please the landowner.

I know we aren’t anywhere near that now, but I want to understand while it is in the future.

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service