Section 27 that is owned by Louisiana State? eg...part of Eagle Nest
Can you believe that the State of Louisiana is stating that they own the mineral rights to part of section 27? What are everyones thoughts on this? I am mad myself! What about a petition?
Views: 221
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by doorsclosing on
-
The government owns the mineral rights to a great deal of property. Any property sold to satisfy tax liens or adjudicated property for that matter will have the mineral rights reserved for the local, parish, or state, whatever. Redeemed property by the original owner is the only way they can't get the rights. Here's another kicker, I was reading something about the government taking over land in need of drainage or some kind of flooding issues with the land. Okay they do give it back to it's rightful owner(s) but not with the mineral rights. Lake Bistineau was ordered to be drained for some reason once a year for 3 years I believe. Not really sure about this but it could be worth looking in to.
-
Permalink Reply by barneyfife on
-
The beds and bottoms of Red River are owned by the State of Louisiana. If the river changed course,the State would also claim the old bed of the river (for minerals). If the river changes course, the State gains mineral interest. This is known as the Freeze Statute.
-
Permalink Reply by The_Baron on -
The freeze statute only applies to areas that are HBP. Old water bottoms would prescribe to the surface owner.
-
Permalink Reply by PENNY on
-
MR FREYOU GAVE US ANOTHER ANSWER 1921 LITIGATION, READ MY EARLIER EMAIL...SO NOW WHAT DO WE DO?
-
Permalink Reply by The_Baron on
-
you need to view the patent for the lands in this section. It is not unusual to see a mineral reservation in the patent. These rights do not prescribe.
-
-
WELL, IF MR FREYOU WILL EMAIL ME THE LITIGATION CASE NUMBER TO THE 1921 LAW, ARE WHAT EVER HIS EXCUSE IS (REFER BACK TO MY EMAIL WITH HIS REPLY) THEN MAYBE I CAN SEE WHAT HE IS TALKING ABOUT, I WOULD LOVE TO HAVE A CERTIFIED COPY OF THIS! HA ! I BET WE NEVER SEE THAT........ THERE ARE TOO MANY POLITICIANS INVOLVED PROTECTING THIS SECTION! BUT I CAN TELL YOU WHEN I BOUGHT MY PROPERTY LIKE MANY OTHER FOLKS I WAS GIVEN ALL MINERAL RIGHTS. IT IS FUNNY HOW ALL THESE TITLE SEARCH COMPANIES HAD NO IDEA OF THIS. SO THAT MEANS THE STATE MUST HAVE JUMP ON THIS LONG BEFORE WE KNEW ABOUT THE HAYNESVILLE SHALE.. HMMMMMM
-
Permalink Reply by Bandit, UMO on -
Penny,
Here's what we were given by a landman friend. We have shared this with some of your neighbors. Good luck! - Attachments:
-
-
Patent 11855.pdf, 1.1 MB -
Patent 12174.pdf, 1 MB
-
State Tract Book-1.pdf, 1 MB
-
-
Permalink Reply by Bandit, UMO on
-
Is there anybody out there that can get a copy of Act 202 of 1924? If so, can you post it here?
Thanks!
- ‹ Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com
Top Content
Blog Posts
The Lithium Connection to Shale Drilling
Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…
ContinuePosted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40
Not a member? Get our email.
Groups
-
San Augustine, TX
386 members
-
Miller County, Arkansas
27 members
-
Sabine Parish, LA
455 members
-
South Caddo Parish Group
440 members
-
Natchitoches Parish
400 members
-
Bienville Parish, LA
244 members
-
Fayetteville Shale
149 members
-
North Caddo Parish
358 members
-
Central Texas Gas
63 members
-
Cass County, TX
119 members
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
