Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by sesport on June 17, 2009 at 12:08

Baron & Jay - Thanks to you both, much appreciation. Hopefully, those looking to get questions answered, wanting clarification, will find there way here. I know I'll be suggesting that they take a look if I'm asked.

best - :0)

Permalink Reply by sesport on June 17, 2009 at 4:58

Even Chesapeake & Petrohawk have conflicting maps. :0)

Permalink Reply by The_Baron on June 17, 2009 at 5:28

Funny how each companies maps tend to show that their leaseholds are the best isn't it???

Permalink Reply by BirdDawg, plain ole' idiot on June 17, 2009 at 5:42

Chesapeakes and Petrohawks have a lot of similarities, the main differences being what may be considered "fringe areas". And like Baron says, the companies tend to show that their leaseholds may be in the better areas.
The old mineral board map refers to "Potential Haynesville Shale in North Louisiana". And according to industry experts, that map is now known to be grossly inaccurate. In other words, it does not show what it says it shows, so why repeatedly attempt to mislead people. But for the life of me, I would not understand posting the best Haynesville Shale map in existence (whatever that may be) in nearly every discussion, much less one that has basically no relevence.
I have told Gray numerous times that I wish him the best and that I believe that his properties have great potential for production, just my opinion, I am not an industry expert. He has repeatedly stated that that I have some ulterior motive regarding my posts, and that I post under different names on this site. Both statements are false (lies).
I believe repeated postings of this nature could be detrimental to some observers as they may think that perhaps their lease may be worth a huge amount more than it really is. And it could then cause a company to abandon a drilling project that could have possibly been very beneficial to many people.
I firmly believe the main goal of this site is for people to learn, not for people to be misled.

Permalink Reply by Bobi Carr ("parker") on June 17, 2009 at 5:46

All of us want "our" area to be the core. Gray is just hopefull. I don't see why this should bother anyone. Keith hasn't told gray to stop posting the maps so I don't see how anyone else should. I'm always curious as to what he will dig up.

Permalink Reply by Bobi Carr ("parker") on June 17, 2009 at 5:47

BirdDawg,

Who was it that wanted to meet up and kick your butt? (mine too for that matter)

Permalink Reply by BirdDawg, plain ole' idiot on June 17, 2009 at 5:58

Wasn't it "Billy Bob Redneck"?
And by the way Parker, I am not telling anyone to do anything. I am only questioning why they are doing it. And by the way Parker, you should join "Grays Claiborne Parish group". Lots of info on there you may find interesting.

Permalink Reply by BirdDawg, plain ole' idiot on June 17, 2009 at 6:36

Parker,
You are right, that one night stand by Billy Bob Redneck was a memorable one.
Not one of GHS's finer moments, but memorable.

Permalink Reply by Bobi Carr ("parker") on June 17, 2009 at 6:44

KB,

What about poor Ruston, bless his soul?

I agree that most of them are funny now.

Permalink Reply by Cathaus on June 17, 2009 at 6:57

I remember when Parker and I outed a "commercial fisherman"!

Permalink Reply by Bobi Carr ("parker") on June 17, 2009 at 7:11

Cathaus,

Satin sheets and RSP was one of the funniest reads.

Permalink Reply by Cathaus on June 17, 2009 at 8:14

My burns have healed nicely, thank you very much!
And no more RSP and satin sheets for me. And even if I thought I looked hot, Mr. Cathaus said the RSP worn over my Depends was not such a turn on.

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• Next ›
• Page