We were offered $4,000 per acre and 25%. I have no idea if this is a good deal or not. Can anyone give us a clue as to whether this is something we should go forward with or not???
lanadan, once again, you're deliberately misconstruing what I said.
I'll claim:
1) If someone wants to cheat mineral interest owners, there are additional ways to cheat a UMO vs. a leased mineral owner.
2) Some people will try to cheat mineral owners of either kind.
3) A UMO needs to be prepared to prevent UMO-specific fraud in payments.
I NEVER said that going UMO was necessarily a bad idea. You should probably be prepared for more effort on your part as a UMO, but you should also expect to get more money in the long run.
True, but I suspect they're not going to offer you a lease unless they think lease will pay more than UMO. Of course, the big boys guess wrong a lot of the time, too.
It would be interesting to see statistics on whether, on average, leased or UMO pays better.
by "lease will pay more than UMO", I obviously meant "pays off for the lessee" better than UMO.
I suspect they're not going to offer you a lease unless they think being leased will pay you less than going UMO. Of course, the big boys guess wrong a lot of the time, too.