Thanks for answering so quickly. I do not live on the property, my grandfather left the mineral rights to me. I know it is in southeast rusk county, close to Panola. I will call Goodrich today to ask the questions you recommended. I appreciate your help.
I have been contacted by Goodrich regarding 2.5 acres in rusk county left to me by my grandfather. They are offering $500 sign on and 3/16 royalty. Is that a good offer? I have no idea!
werent they only in there about 2 weeks with the rig. I wouldnt think they drilled very deep in that amount of time. Maybe someone else knows what happened.
yes the mitchel trust well. they filed a new permit friday. it is on the rrc site.
Status # 670592
API # OP # 609261 - NFR ENERGY, LLC
Pending Approval , Submitted 09/05/2008 , Filed Online MITCHELL TRUST - Well # 1A
06 - SHELBY County New Drill
Vertical
DRILLING PERMIT #664844 ABANDONED & REDR ( 09/05/2008 11:10:40 AM )
API 401-34516.
Some info was reported in the Tyler paper. Here is an excerpt and a link.
"When gauged on an 18/64-inch choke, the Boles Well No. 1 potentialed 621,000 cubic feet of gas per day. This well is located 2.9 miles northwest of Wheelock in the Naconiche Creek. Chesapeake Operating Inc. completed the well to a depth of 11,757 feet. Production is in the Rodessa-Travis Peak Consolidated formation."
Lee, what is the latest on the new well west of my property. I heard the rig is gone and they flanged it. Will they come in now and perforate it and fac it? It still puzzles me why they only permitted to 13000 ft. Both the chesapeake well west of us and the big well just south of murvall were 14k. And I know for a fact the well Phillips drilled right next to our property back in 80 hit high pressure at 13300 because the mud man said he used at least 15# mud to hold it down. that well was on the highest point arround.
Lee,
CHK's CEO, Aubrey McClendon, has pegged the Haynesville Shale--several times in comments to Wall Street analysts --as underlying about 3.5 million acres (an area of 5469 square miles ). Recently he described it in a conference call as "a square area about 75 miles on a side" which would be about 3.6 million acres
The larger it is obviously the better it is for the mineral owners, but it is better for our economy--all of us, producers, pipeline cos. and consumers, etc which includes us all because it increases the likelihood that we have more than enough natural gas reserves to divorce the US from its devastating dependence on OPEC crude oil and finally, switch to a clean, superior, abundant American fuel.
my dad also refused to lease for the coal. I hear nfr is setting up to drill the well west of me too. No doubt we're in the shale. Just wondering how long before the bonus money gets good. Maybe a year...
Comment Wall (18 comments)
You need to be a member of GoHaynesvilleShale.com to add comments!
Join GoHaynesvilleShale.com
landownerGone Fishin said…
landownermary said…
landownermary said…
landownerGone Fishin said…
landownerGone Fishin said…
Status # 670592
API # OP # 609261 - NFR ENERGY, LLC
Pending Approval , Submitted 09/05/2008 , Filed Online MITCHELL TRUST - Well # 1A
06 - SHELBY County New Drill
Vertical
DRILLING PERMIT #664844 ABANDONED & REDR ( 09/05/2008 11:10:40 AM )
landownerGone Fishin said…
Some info was reported in the Tyler paper. Here is an excerpt and a link.
"When gauged on an 18/64-inch choke, the Boles Well No. 1 potentialed 621,000 cubic feet of gas per day. This well is located 2.9 miles northwest of Wheelock in the Naconiche Creek. Chesapeake Operating Inc. completed the well to a depth of 11,757 feet. Production is in the Rodessa-Travis Peak Consolidated formation."
http://www.tylerpaper.com/article/20080727/BUSINESS03/807260309
I will keep my eyes open for more information on this well.
landownerGone Fishin said…
CHK's CEO, Aubrey McClendon, has pegged the Haynesville Shale--several times in comments to Wall Street analysts --as underlying about 3.5 million acres (an area of 5469 square miles ). Recently he described it in a conference call as "a square area about 75 miles on a side" which would be about 3.6 million acres
The larger it is obviously the better it is for the mineral owners, but it is better for our economy--all of us, producers, pipeline cos. and consumers, etc which includes us all because it increases the likelihood that we have more than enough natural gas reserves to divorce the US from its devastating dependence on OPEC crude oil and finally, switch to a clean, superior, abundant American fuel.
landownerGone Fishin said…
View All Comments