Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on April 15, 2009 at 13:39

Count me in.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bobi Carr ("parker") on April 15, 2009 at 13:45

Lots of things that sound good in theory don't necessarily work in practice, but a STRICTLY SHALE GROUP OR AREA sounds good to me.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Two Dogs, Pirate on April 15, 2009 at 15:41

Go for it Jay, I am with you.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Cathaus on April 15, 2009 at 14:24

I think this decision is up to the person that owns, maintains and pays for this site.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Cathaus on April 15, 2009 at 14:37

Let's face it Jay. There has not been anything too exciting going on lately. When things heat back up, I am sure we will once again be All about the Shale.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on April 15, 2009 at 14:39

Yes, the decision is Keith's. And he appreciates feedback.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by RAY on April 16, 2009 at 12:53

this site is left as it is, I would like to see the [off the wall] COMMENTS that has nothing to do with the discussion DELETED

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Cathaus on April 15, 2009 at 14:42

I think he has a sense of humor. He enjoys some levity from time to time. I recommend it to everyone. Lord knows, we sure could use some in this day and age.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bobi Carr ("parker") on April 15, 2009 at 14:52

Cathaus,

I don't think the funny stuff is the problem (well it might be for a few).

I like when we can talk shale and have a little fun too, but a SERIOUS section only would be a welcome haven.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by LP on April 15, 2009 at 14:38

I would like such a split.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bob Ballard on April 15, 2009 at 14:55

I also vote for the split

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by sesport on April 15, 2009 at 14:53

On the central main page, I see 20 discussions posted. Of those, 3 are categorized as political, 1 is categorized as "Out of Gas," 1 is categorized as financial and the remaining 15 are categorized as shale related topics. The majority of the topics are shale related, IMO.

The "hot" topics percolate to the top as responses are added. And if one is following a topic, how do any of the others interfere?

The blogs have their own split off to the side.

I'm not sure I understand the problem. The numbers don't support the notion that the main page topics are unfavorably weighted against shale topics, IMO.

best - sesport :0)

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• …
• 9
• Next ›
• Page