Exco (Winchester) - HA RA SUB; Lattin 24 # 4/ Section 24, T14N-R14W 16,677 Mcf/day

TD: 15951'
Perfs: 12785' - 15907'
20/64 Choke

16,677 Mcd/day
129 BBls/ water
Casing pressure 7000 psig

Static pressure 1005, diff 170, line 4.029, plate 2.50, meter spring & diff range 1000 X 400
24 hour test on well meter

Comp. date 2/8/2009

Views: 144

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Jay Murrell on April 16, 2009 at 11:27
The above is the initial potential report dated 3/4, the official completion report date stamped 3/20 is as follows:

18915 Mcf/day on a 12/64" choke and 153.33 BBls water/day.

Pretty good well.
Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on April 16, 2009 at 15:04
Jay, I think Exco is showing they have some really good people - both technical and management.
Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on April 16, 2009 at 15:19
Jay, Exco announced the test rates as follows on 26/64" chokes

Lattin 24 #4 - 24.2 MMcfd
Oden Heirs 30 #6 - 22.9 MMcfd, 7800#

Both really excellent wells.

The Ops VP is a former Mobil guy.
Permalink Reply by Scott on April 16, 2009 at 16:21
Where are those wells located?
Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on April 16, 2009 at 16:48
Scott, see the following info. Both wells are in the Holly Field in De Soto Parish.

Exco, Oden Heirs 30 #H6 Well, Serial #238245, S30-T14N-R13W
Exco, Lattin 24 #4 Well, Serial #238995, S24-T14N-R14W
Permalink Reply by Scott on April 17, 2009 at 3:01
Thanks Les....
Permalink Reply by M. Mcwilliams on April 16, 2009 at 15:39
I love this news, thank you for reporting it. Exco just today put up a rig in my section - it is the Bates 21 #1, Sec. 21 T15N R13W. They've been drilling just across the road in Sec. 27 for a couple of weeks, that one is the Crnkovic 27. Here's hoping for similar outcomes. Also good to hear that they have a good reputation.
Permalink Reply by Scott on April 16, 2009 at 16:12
Jay,

Is there similar thickness of the shale in 16N-14W. Could the wells in this township have similar IP rates?
Permalink Reply by Scott on April 17, 2009 at 3:01
So it pretty much all comes down to the operator and who does a better frac job. Thanks...
Permalink Reply by Thomas Wright on April 16, 2009 at 14:52
Does anyone know if this is produced water or frac water?
Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on April 16, 2009 at 15:01
Thomas, that would be frac water.
Permalink Reply by Spring Branch,mineral owner on April 16, 2009 at 19:45
No, but I would be extremely interested in hearing the results.

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Top Content 

1 Looking Back At The Haynesville Shale - A Retrospective

Looking Back At The Haynesville Shale - A Retrospective
2 Pending Public Oil and Gas Hearings

Pending Public Oil and Gas Hearings
3 Comstock October Presentation

Comstock October Presentation
4 Aethon looks for Buyers of its Haynesville Assets

Aethon looks for Buyers of its Haynesville Assets
5 Notice Emails Are Back! Please review how they work.

Notice Emails Are Back! Please review how they work.
6 Arkansas O&G Commission unanimously denies royalty rate application for lithium extraction

Arkansas O&G Commission unanimously denies royalty rate application for lithium extraction
7 Landowners in Haynesville, La

Landowners in Haynesville, La

Blog Posts

The Lithium Connection to Shale Drilling

Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…

Continue

Posted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service