Les Bamburg's Discussions (5,266)

View

Discussions Replied To (3698)	Replies	Latest Activity
landowner "Ken, see my post below with some cumulative oil & gas production data for the Sm…" Les Bamburg replied Jul 4, 2010 to Smackover Sand Deposit	151	Jul 12, 2010 Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant
landowner "KCM, attached is some cumulative oil & gas production data for the Smackover in…" Les Bamburg replied Jul 4, 2010 to Smackover Sand Deposit	151	Jul 12, 2010 Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant
landowner "Ken, yes - the various 3-D seismic shoots should provide insight into all formations…" Les Bamburg replied Jul 4, 2010 to Smackover Sand Deposit	151	Jul 12, 2010 Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant
"Titleist, because it helps the operator optimize the placement of wells in all the s…" Les Bamburg replied Jul 3, 2010 to Reason for seismograph in already drilled section	3	Jul 6, 2010 Reply by My name is Oil
landowner "Thompson, when you find a geologist or geophysicist that will tell you about "Sasqua…" Les Bamburg replied Jul 3, 2010 to Smackover Sand Deposit	151	Jul 12, 2010 Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant
landowner "Marc, the Smackover can be oil productive or natural gas productive dependent upon t…" Les Bamburg replied Jul 3, 2010 to Smackover Sand Deposit	151	Jul 12, 2010 Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant
landowner "Jay, all three of the wells I listed are permitted as Smackover." Les Bamburg replied Jul 3, 2010 to Smackover Sand Deposit	151	Jul 12, 2010 Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant
landowner "Marc, as stated above the Smackover Formation would be located immediately below the…" Les Bamburg replied Jul 3, 2010 to Smackover Sand Deposit	151	Jul 12, 2010 Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant
landowner "KCM, I do recall our previous discussion regarding the following three wells. My onl…" Les Bamburg replied Jul 3, 2010 to Smackover Sand Deposit	151	Jul 12, 2010 Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant
landowner "KCM, I believe the permits just say Smackover and do not specify sandstone, limeston…" Les Bamburg replied Jul 3, 2010 to Smackover Sand Deposit	151	Jul 12, 2010 Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant

‹ Previous
1
…
136
137
138
139
140
…
370
Next ›

Welcome to
GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Sign Up
or Sign In

Or sign in with:

📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Click Forum and scroll down past the last discussion and click the "Follow" button.

Top Content

1	Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map
2	More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs
3	what does this mean
4	Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5
5	Adjustments to revenue statemens older than 3 years by BPX
6	Unleased Louisiana Mineral Owners Are on the Hook for Post-Production Costs
7	Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high

RSS
View All

Groups

Unleased Mineral Owners

287 members
Red River Parish

307 members

Natchitoches Parish

409 members
ALTERNATE ENERGY TECHNOL…

6 members

Union County, AR

49 members

View All

© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by

Badges | Report an Issue | Terms of Service

#xg { position:relative;top:120px; } #xn_bar { top:120px; }

Hello, you need to enable JavaScript to use GoHaynesvilleShale.com.

Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.