Andrew's Discussions (544)

View

Discussions Replied To (339)	Replies	Latest Activity
landowner "Regarding Henry's point on the courts' reluctance to enforce these provisions in fav…" Andrew replied Feb 21, 2013 to UMI Question	23	Feb 21, 2013 Reply by Henry
landowner "I agree that courts will strictly construe these statutes in favor of the operator.…" Andrew replied Feb 21, 2013 to UMI Question	23	Feb 21, 2013 Reply by Henry
landowner "Right you are, I wasn't aware of that provision. However, 1 acre's worth of drilling…" Andrew replied Feb 20, 2013 to Certified Letter	22	Feb 21, 2013 Reply by Teri Graves
landowner "HBP, are you sure you aren't thinking of the obligation to pay royalty below minimum…" Andrew replied Feb 20, 2013 to Certified Letter	22	Feb 21, 2013 Reply by Teri Graves
"Agreed. I'd much rather they leave it in the ground until the price comes up another…" Andrew replied Feb 15, 2013 to Encana moving back into Haynesville	34	Feb 22, 2013 Reply by kittycatmama
"The Mineral Code makes clear that termination is not a favored remedy because it's t…" Andrew replied Feb 14, 2013 to Mineral rights under Parish roadbeds?	24	Feb 14, 2013 Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant
"I've got a Mineral Code doozy for you though: What happens to a mineral owner whose…" Andrew replied Feb 14, 2013 to Mineral rights under Parish roadbeds?	24	Feb 14, 2013 Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant
"You're totally right, the commissioner is almost certainly not policing that, althou…" Andrew replied Feb 14, 2013 to Mineral rights under Parish roadbeds?	24	Feb 14, 2013 Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant
"I agree that such a situation is not directly anticipated by the mineral code, and i…" Andrew replied Feb 13, 2013 to Mineral rights under Parish roadbeds?	24	Feb 14, 2013 Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant
"At the risk of sounding wonky, even if there were gaps in the mineral code for new s…" Andrew replied Feb 13, 2013 to Mineral rights under Parish roadbeds?	24	Feb 14, 2013 Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant

‹ Previous
1
…
15
16
17
18
19
…
34
Next ›

Welcome to
GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Sign Up
or Sign In

Or sign in with:

📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Click Forum and scroll down past the last discussion and click the "Follow" button.

Top Content

1	Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map
2	More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs
3	Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5
4	Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high
5	Unleased Louisiana Mineral Owners Are on the Hook for Post-Production Costs
6	Rockcliff III Counters Haynesville Inventory Concerns with Shelby Trough Push
7	Request For Assistance

RSS
View All

Groups

Red River Parish

307 members
Natchitoches Parish

409 members

Unleased Mineral Owners

286 members
ALTERNATE ENERGY TECHNOL…

6 members

Union County, AR

49 members

View All

© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by

Badges | Report an Issue | Terms of Service

#xg { position:relative;top:120px; } #xn_bar { top:120px; }

Hello, you need to enable JavaScript to use GoHaynesvilleShale.com.

Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.