Brian's Discussions (48)
| Discussions Replied To (14) | Replies | Latest Activity |
|---|---|---|
|
landowner "The forty acres sold in 1999 retaining the mineral rights is Sec 2, T18 R15 the SE/4…"Brian replied Jul 24, 2009 to Twin Cities - incompetent or dishonest - you decide |
37 |
Oct 8, 2009 Reply by BirdDawg, plain ole' idiot |
|
landowner "Thank you for your replys. It has been interesting reading your responses. Since I d…"Brian replied May 17, 2009 to Twin Cities - incompetent or dishonest - you decide |
37 |
Oct 8, 2009 Reply by BirdDawg, plain ole' idiot |
|
landowner "Yes the mineral lease was executed by a land owner that did not own the mineral righ…"Brian replied May 17, 2009 to Twin Cities - incompetent or dishonest - you decide |
37 |
Oct 8, 2009 Reply by BirdDawg, plain ole' idiot |
|
landowner "Did you mean "valid" or "invalid" in your response. My title reads "If Vendor owns…"Brian replied May 17, 2009 to Twin Cities - incompetent or dishonest - you decide |
37 |
Oct 8, 2009 Reply by BirdDawg, plain ole' idiot |
- ‹ Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next ›
📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Visit the Forum and click "Follow" after the last discussion.
Visit the Forum and click "Follow" after the last discussion.
Top Content
Groups
-
North LA Cotton Valley C…
68 members
-
Shelby County, TX
478 members
-
Nacogdoches County
194 members
-
SMACKOVER LITHIUM GROUP …
11 members
-
Natchitoches Parish
405 members
-
WESTERN HAYNESVILLE
18 members
-
Bienville Parish, LA
250 members
-
Sabine Parish, LA
457 members
-
SMACKOVER LITHIUM GROUP …
11 members
-
San Augustine, TX
388 members
Blog Posts
Tuscaloosa Trend Sits On Top Of Poorest Neighbourhood For Decades - Yet No Royalties Ever Paid To The Community -- Why??
Posted by Char on May 29, 2025 at 14:42 — 4 Comments
© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
