Brian's Discussions (48)
| Discussions Replied To (14) | Replies | Latest Activity |
|---|---|---|
|
landowner "The forty acres sold in 1999 retaining the mineral rights is Sec 2, T18 R15 the SE/4…"Brian replied Jul 24, 2009 to Twin Cities - incompetent or dishonest - you decide |
37 |
Oct 8, 2009 Reply by BirdDawg, plain ole' idiot |
|
landowner "Thank you for your replys. It has been interesting reading your responses. Since I d…"Brian replied May 17, 2009 to Twin Cities - incompetent or dishonest - you decide |
37 |
Oct 8, 2009 Reply by BirdDawg, plain ole' idiot |
|
landowner "Yes the mineral lease was executed by a land owner that did not own the mineral righ…"Brian replied May 17, 2009 to Twin Cities - incompetent or dishonest - you decide |
37 |
Oct 8, 2009 Reply by BirdDawg, plain ole' idiot |
|
landowner "Did you mean "valid" or "invalid" in your response. My title reads "If Vendor owns…"Brian replied May 17, 2009 to Twin Cities - incompetent or dishonest - you decide |
37 |
Oct 8, 2009 Reply by BirdDawg, plain ole' idiot |
- ‹ Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next ›
📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Click Forum and scroll down past the last discussion and click the "Follow" button.
Click Forum and scroll down past the last discussion and click the "Follow" button.
Top Content
Groups
-
Red River Parish
307 members
-
Natchitoches Parish
409 members
-
Unleased Mineral Owners
286 members
-
ALTERNATE ENERGY TECHNOL…
6 members
-
Union County, AR
49 members
© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
