The_Baron's Discussions (3,759)

View

Discussions Replied To (3499)	Replies	Latest Activity
"All you would have to do is transfer your minerals to another person or corporation,…" The_Baron replied May 19, 2009 to Cobra Petroleum Company-Mineral Owner Beware!	14	May 19, 2009 Reply by Kat Bloomfield
"I am confused. To be legal, a mineral deed must be signed, notorized and recorded.…" The_Baron replied May 19, 2009 to Cobra Petroleum Company-Mineral Owner Beware!	14	May 19, 2009 Reply by Kat Bloomfield
landowner "And Three votes...." The_Baron replied May 19, 2009 to RESULTS of the Producers Poll - "Taking into account all considerations, which producer would you rather see DRILL A WELL on your property?”	14	May 19, 2009 Reply by Les Bamburg
landowner "I would restrict the vote to operators with approved units." The_Baron replied May 19, 2009 to RESULTS of the Producers Poll - "Taking into account all considerations, which producer would you rather see DRILL A WELL on your property?”	14	May 19, 2009 Reply by Les Bamburg
landowner "Perhaps this would be better: http://www.mathopenref.com/polygonirregulararea.html" The_Baron replied May 19, 2009 to MATH ??:: Lot Meaurements to ACREage	74	Jun 9, 2009 Reply by Mac Davis
landowner "Thats why I wanted to know if he has a plat. But the principle is the same, You can…" The_Baron replied May 19, 2009 to MATH ??:: Lot Meaurements to ACREage	74	Jun 9, 2009 Reply by Mac Davis
landowner "Try talking up Samson, they probally won't start with the highest offer." The_Baron replied May 19, 2009 to Help, regarding leasing in Red River Parish	8	May 19, 2009 Reply by Trisha Giddens
landowner "How many times do we have to go over this?" The_Baron replied May 19, 2009 to ANYONE CONSIDERING SIGNING A LEASE? FYI: 200% PENALTY FOR WIO DOES NOT APPLY TO UMI !	18	May 22, 2009 Reply by lanadan Ds3
landowner "Yes, but I believe Electrodynamics was trying to say that the Exco and CHK Sharp wel…" The_Baron replied May 19, 2009 to well # 239214 just reported	33	Sep 30, 2009 Reply by The_Baron
landowner "From the initial gossip I heard, this was supposed to be a strong well. The 5.2 mmcf…" The_Baron replied May 19, 2009 to well # 239214 just reported	33	Sep 30, 2009 Reply by The_Baron

‹ Previous
1
…
199
200
201
202
203
…
350
Next ›

Welcome to
GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Sign Up
or Sign In

Or sign in with:

📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Click Forum and scroll down past the last discussion and click the "Follow" button.

Top Content

1	Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map
2	More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs
3	what does this mean
4	Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5
5	Adjustments to revenue statemens older than 3 years by BPX
6	Unleased Louisiana Mineral Owners Are on the Hook for Post-Production Costs
7	Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high

RSS
View All

Groups

Unleased Mineral Owners

287 members
Red River Parish

307 members

Natchitoches Parish

409 members
ALTERNATE ENERGY TECHNOL…

6 members

Union County, AR

49 members

View All

© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by

Badges | Report an Issue | Terms of Service

#xg { position:relative;top:120px; } #xn_bar { top:120px; }

Hello, you need to enable JavaScript to use GoHaynesvilleShale.com.

Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.