RESULTS of the Producers Poll - "Taking into account all considerations, which producer would you rather see DRILL A WELL on your property?”
Results after 580 votes. This are IP votes. Each IP gets one vote.
28% - Petrohawk
22% - Chesapeake Energy
10% EnCana
10% Devon Energy
5% Shell
Not too late to vote. Go cast your vote.
And tell us why you voted the way you did.
28% - Petrohawk
22% - Chesapeake Energy
10% EnCana
10% Devon Energy
5% Shell
Not too late to vote. Go cast your vote.
And tell us why you voted the way you did.
Views: 34
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on
-
Did you all have some thoughts as to the results of the poll?
-
Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on -
Keith, top two were expected but I am surprised EXCO did not rank considering their stong early results. They have tested 5 wells at > 20 MMcfd and have 3 wells in the top 5.
-
Permalink Reply by Spring Branch,mineral owner on
-
I agree with Les. Anyone that chooses Swepi (Shell) over EXCO is nuts. Question: How many wells has Shell announced with IP's over 5 MIllion cu ft/day................Answer....ZERO. I'm not saying they don't have them, but if they do, they sure haven't announced them.
-
Permalink Reply by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on
-
Nice thought. Should there an minimum acreage requirement?
-
Permalink Reply by Spring Branch,mineral owner on
-
That's two votes.
-
Permalink Reply by BirdDawg, plain ole' idiot on
-
And Questar hasn't done bad at all, considering the small number of Horizontal HS they have drilled.
-
Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on
-
BD, I'm with you on that one plus Questar has proven their skill at developing tight gas in the Rockies.
-
Permalink Reply by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on
-
enabled the comments section
-
Permalink Reply by Count of Monte Cristo on
-
I think this is mainly people reacting to the huge 20 million + cubic feet IP numbers from Elm Grove wells drilled by Petrohawk. The question is, if that acreage was held by a Chesapeake or Encana, could they have gotten such high IP flows? who knows.
Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com
Top Content
Not a member? Get our email.
Groups
-
San Augustine, TX
386 members
-
Natchitoches Parish
399 members
-
Cass County, TX
119 members
-
Franklin County, Texas
8 members
-
Rusk County
97 members
-
Vernon Parish
59 members
-
Bienville Parish, LA
242 members
-
Sabine County, Texas
172 members
-
Sabine Parish, LA
455 members
-
Angelina County, TX
87 members
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
