RESULTS of the Producers Poll - "Taking into account all considerations, which producer would you rather see DRILL A WELL on your property?”

Results after 580 votes. This are IP votes. Each IP gets one vote.

28% - Petrohawk
22% - Chesapeake Energy
10% EnCana
10% Devon Energy
5% Shell

Not too late to vote. Go cast your vote.

And tell us why you voted the way you did.

Views: 45

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on May 19, 2009 at 2:18
Did you all have some thoughts as to the results of the poll?
Permalink Reply by Catfish on May 19, 2009 at 2:23
I'm surprised with the Hawk's success more people didn't pick them.
Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on May 19, 2009 at 2:59
Keith, top two were expected but I am surprised EXCO did not rank considering their stong early results. They have tested 5 wells at > 20 MMcfd and have 3 wells in the top 5.
Permalink Reply by Spring Branch,mineral owner on May 19, 2009 at 3:27
I agree with Les. Anyone that chooses Swepi (Shell) over EXCO is nuts. Question: How many wells has Shell announced with IP's over 5 MIllion cu ft/day................Answer....ZERO. I'm not saying they don't have them, but if they do, they sure haven't announced them.
Permalink Reply by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on May 19, 2009 at 3:50
Nice thought. Should there an minimum acreage requirement?
Permalink Reply by The_Baron on May 19, 2009 at 4:27
I would restrict the vote to operators with approved units.
Permalink Reply by Spring Branch,mineral owner on May 19, 2009 at 3:52
That's two votes.
Permalink Reply by The_Baron on May 19, 2009 at 4:28
And Three votes....
Permalink Reply by BirdDawg, plain ole' idiot on May 19, 2009 at 9:07
And Questar hasn't done bad at all, considering the small number of Horizontal HS they have drilled.
Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on May 19, 2009 at 9:11
BD, I'm with you on that one plus Questar has proven their skill at developing tight gas in the Rockies.
Permalink Reply by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on May 19, 2009 at 6:02
enabled the comments section
Permalink Reply by Count of Monte Cristo on May 19, 2009 at 7:11
I think this is mainly people reacting to the huge 20 million + cubic feet IP numbers from Elm Grove wells drilled by Petrohawk. The question is, if that acreage was held by a Chesapeake or Encana, could they have gotten such high IP flows? who knows.

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Top Content 

1 Enhanced Geothermal Systems: Unlocking Earth's Hidden Energy Potential

Enhanced Geothermal Systems: Unlocking Earth's Hidden Energy Potential
2 More Permian Associated Gas to Depress the Price of Haynesville Gas

More Permian Associated Gas to Depress the Price of Haynesville Gas
3 The Explosive Evolution of Fracking: A 75-Year Journey

The Explosive Evolution of Fracking: A 75-Year Journey
4 Cotton Valley Leasing Activity in Rusk County

Cotton Valley Leasing Activity in Rusk County
5 Notice Emails Are Back! Please review how they work.

Notice Emails Are Back! Please review how they work.
6 Pending Public Oil and Gas Hearings

Pending Public Oil and Gas Hearings
7 SWA Processing Brine From Its First Supply Well

SWA Processing Brine From Its First Supply Well

Blog Posts

The Lithium Connection to Shale Drilling

Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…

Continue

Posted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service