Les Bamburg's Discussions (5,266)

View

Discussions Replied To (3698)	Replies	Latest Activity
Oil & Gas Pro "Catwoman, the Texas Commission of Environmental Quality (TCEQ) should have a listing…" Les Bamburg replied Jan 6, 2010 to Natural Gas Emission Specialist new to this GREAT SHALE!	7	Jan 7, 2010 Reply by PIPELINE OPERATOR
Oil & Gas Pro "KJ, that question for the Barnett Shale is rather complicated. The original "core" i…" Les Bamburg replied Jan 6, 2010 to The Texas Core area	16	Jan 7, 2010 Reply by RBH
landowner "SB, I was referring to #3 above rather than #4. So my comments were concerning alter…" Les Bamburg replied Jan 5, 2010 to 2010 Unit Application features/trends I've noticed upon review, year to date.	46	Jan 6, 2010 Reply by Spring Branch,mineral owner
landowner "VSC, I believe the acreage being considered did not include DeSoto Parish." Les Bamburg replied Jan 5, 2010 to Swepi (SHELL OIL) and their phenominal Haynesville Shale track record!	81	Jul 14, 2010 Reply by Les Bamburg
Oil & Gas Pro "Jerry, still too early to say in Texas because not enough information is available." Les Bamburg replied Jan 5, 2010 to The Texas Core area	16	Jan 7, 2010 Reply by RBH
Oil & Gas Pro "KJ, I would say Barnett Shale areas were fairly well defined during the 2004 to 2007…" Les Bamburg replied Jan 5, 2010 to The Texas Core area	16	Jan 7, 2010 Reply by RBH
Oil & Gas Pro "Jerry, every company has a different interpretation of the "core" area in Texas." Les Bamburg replied Jan 4, 2010 to The Texas Core area	16	Jan 7, 2010 Reply by RBH
Oil & Gas Pro "Jay, Chesapeake stated in today's conference call that the majority of the 100,000 a…" Les Bamburg replied Jan 4, 2010 to Chesapeake and Plains Selling Acreage outside of Core	136	Feb 28, 2010 Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant
Oil & Gas Pro "William, the Marcellus Shale has the best economics with the Haynesville Shale and E…" Les Bamburg replied Jan 4, 2010 to Chesapeake and Plains Selling Acreage outside of Core	136	Feb 28, 2010 Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant
"Cheerleader, the following are some of the potential field names utilized for the pl…" Les Bamburg replied Jan 3, 2010 to Texas Railroad Commission Adopts New Temporary Field Rules for Carthage (Haynesville Shale) Field	20	Jan 5, 2010 Reply by j garrett

‹ Previous
1
…
210
211
212
213
214
…
370
Next ›

Welcome to
GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Sign Up
or Sign In

Or sign in with:

📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Click Forum and scroll down past the last discussion and click the "Follow" button.

Top Content

1	Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map
2	More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs
3	what does this mean
4	Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5
5	Adjustments to revenue statemens older than 3 years by BPX
6	Unleased Louisiana Mineral Owners Are on the Hook for Post-Production Costs
7	Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high

RSS
View All

Groups

Unleased Mineral Owners

287 members
Red River Parish

307 members

Natchitoches Parish

409 members
ALTERNATE ENERGY TECHNOL…

6 members

Union County, AR

49 members

View All

© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by

Badges | Report an Issue | Terms of Service

#xg { position:relative;top:120px; } #xn_bar { top:120px; }

Hello, you need to enable JavaScript to use GoHaynesvilleShale.com.

Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.