Les Bamburg's Discussions (5,266)

View

Discussions Replied To (3698)	Replies	Latest Activity
"Parker, yes - it would definitely be interesting to see their outlines, especially E…" Les Bamburg replied Sep 14, 2009 to Bossier Shale potential	20	Sep 15, 2009 Reply by Les Bamburg
"Taylor, potentially yes but the details and well contral are fairly sketchy at this…" Les Bamburg replied Sep 14, 2009 to Bossier Shale potential	20	Sep 15, 2009 Reply by Les Bamburg
landowner "Baron, most of the wells you are referencing are simply being drilled by two differe…" Les Bamburg replied Sep 14, 2009 to Hey Les or Skip, Got another question	17	Sep 15, 2009 Reply by Mac Davis
landowner "YLO, I assume you mean vertical wells. I have not seen many vertical wells drilled t…" Les Bamburg replied Sep 14, 2009 to Hey Les or Skip, Got another question	17	Sep 15, 2009 Reply by Mac Davis
landowner "YLO, the referenced well is permitted to 11,500' True Vertical Depth and 17,000' (To…" Les Bamburg replied Sep 14, 2009 to Hey Les or Skip, Got another question	17	Sep 15, 2009 Reply by Mac Davis
"Lake, I assume you are referring to the Mid/Upper Bossier Shale play. Keep in mind t…" Les Bamburg replied Sep 14, 2009 to Bossier Shale potential	20	Sep 15, 2009 Reply by Les Bamburg
landowner "SB, I am not doubting your information. I just didn't want people to get the impress…" Les Bamburg replied Sep 13, 2009 to Question for the Haynesville Shale experts...	20	Sep 13, 2009 Reply by Spring Branch,mineral owner
landowner "SB, I did find where EnCana reported in their conference call that the Conway 22 H1…" Les Bamburg replied Sep 13, 2009 to Question for the Haynesville Shale experts...	20	Sep 13, 2009 Reply by Spring Branch,mineral owner
landowner "Parker, the smaller choke would increase the flowing pressure but would reduce the r…" Les Bamburg replied Sep 13, 2009 to Question for the Haynesville Shale experts...	20	Sep 13, 2009 Reply by Spring Branch,mineral owner
landowner "SB, a well flowing with a pressure of say 8200 psi on a 16/64" choke is unlikely to…" Les Bamburg replied Sep 13, 2009 to Question for the Haynesville Shale experts...	20	Sep 13, 2009 Reply by Spring Branch,mineral owner

‹ Previous
1
…
235
236
237
238
239
…
370
Next ›

Welcome to
GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Sign Up
or Sign In

Or sign in with:

📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Click Forum and scroll down past the last discussion and click the "Follow" button.

Top Content

1	Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map
2	More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs
3	what does this mean
4	Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5
5	Adjustments to revenue statemens older than 3 years by BPX
6	Unleased Louisiana Mineral Owners Are on the Hook for Post-Production Costs
7	Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high

RSS
View All

Groups

Unleased Mineral Owners

287 members
Red River Parish

307 members

Natchitoches Parish

409 members
ALTERNATE ENERGY TECHNOL…

6 members

Union County, AR

49 members

View All

© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by

Badges | Report an Issue | Terms of Service

#xg { position:relative;top:120px; } #xn_bar { top:120px; }

Hello, you need to enable JavaScript to use GoHaynesvilleShale.com.

Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.