Andrew's Discussions (544)

View

Discussions Replied To (339)	Replies	Latest Activity
landowner "At the risk of complicating the discussion, a Pugh clause can work against you. Take…" Andrew replied Aug 15, 2012 to Leasing Language Help	25	Aug 16, 2012 Reply by Joe Aldridge
"Indigo probably won't be drilling any time soon. If/when they sell their position yo…" Andrew replied Aug 15, 2012 to Rapides Halcon Lambrigth 1h Broadway 1h	10	Nov 7, 2012 Reply by blackjackjackson
landowner "That would cover his bases in case he is wrong." Andrew replied Aug 14, 2012 to Title Opinions	5	Aug 14, 2012 Reply by Dion Warr, CPL
landowner "Annette, I will send you a friend invite and a private message with a recommendation." Andrew replied Aug 13, 2012 to Any recommendations for attorney in St. Augustine	1	Aug 13, 2012 Reply by Andrew
Oil & Gas Pro "I have attached a copy of the lease, Spring Branch." Andrew replied Aug 13, 2012 to MAGNOLIA POINT MINERALS VS CHK LA AND PXP LA - CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-00854 (Decision On No Cost Royalty Language)	85	Dec 19, 2012 Reply by Jo Ann Carter
landowner "Annette, It is difficult to determine the caliber of the landman and attorney. The…" Andrew replied Aug 12, 2012 to Title Opinions	5	Aug 14, 2012 Reply by Dion Warr, CPL
Oil & Gas Pro "Annette, I would start a new thread on the general forum about this. You may get a b…" Andrew replied Aug 12, 2012 to leases	13	Aug 12, 2012 Reply by Andrew
Oil & Gas Pro "That's a very good point. The stated justification, for better or for worse, for sin…" Andrew replied Aug 12, 2012 to MAGNOLIA POINT MINERALS VS CHK LA AND PXP LA - CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-00854 (Decision On No Cost Royalty Language)	85	Dec 19, 2012 Reply by Jo Ann Carter
Oil & Gas Pro "The opinion I think is dead wrong is the Adams case above. I'm still on the fence a…" Andrew replied Aug 12, 2012 to MAGNOLIA POINT MINERALS VS CHK LA AND PXP LA - CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-00854 (Decision On No Cost Royalty Language)	85	Dec 19, 2012 Reply by Jo Ann Carter
Oil & Gas Pro "The Adams order is attached. I can't stress enough how wrong I think this opinion is…" Andrew replied Aug 10, 2012 to MAGNOLIA POINT MINERALS VS CHK LA AND PXP LA - CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-00854 (Decision On No Cost Royalty Language)	85	Dec 19, 2012 Reply by Jo Ann Carter

‹ Previous
1
…
25
26
27
28
29
…
34
Next ›

Welcome to
GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Sign Up
or Sign In

Or sign in with:

📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Click Forum and scroll down past the last discussion and click the "Follow" button.

Top Content

1	Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map
2	More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs
3	Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5
4	Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high
5	Unleased Louisiana Mineral Owners Are on the Hook for Post-Production Costs
6	Rockcliff III Counters Haynesville Inventory Concerns with Shelby Trough Push
7	Request For Assistance

RSS
View All

Groups

Red River Parish

307 members
Natchitoches Parish

409 members

Unleased Mineral Owners

286 members
ALTERNATE ENERGY TECHNOL…

6 members

Union County, AR

49 members

View All

© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by

Badges | Report an Issue | Terms of Service

#xg { position:relative;top:120px; } #xn_bar { top:120px; }

Hello, you need to enable JavaScript to use GoHaynesvilleShale.com.

Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.