Jay Murrell's Discussions (421)

Discussions Replied To (396) Replies Latest Activity

"Earl, You are an asshole. Jay"

Jay Murrell replied Mar 1, 2009 to Chesapeake slashes 215 jobs ordered to pay 405 million to land owners who

98 Mar 5, 2009
Reply by Antsu-in-Japan

"KB: Are you trying to lable any white person who goes after Obama a racist? I am su…"

Jay Murrell replied Mar 1, 2009 to Chesapeake slashes 215 jobs ordered to pay 405 million to land owners who

98 Mar 5, 2009
Reply by Antsu-in-Japan

"Antsu: Are you trying to spread a lie or are you just not aware of who wrote the Sti…"

Jay Murrell replied Mar 1, 2009 to Chesapeake slashes 215 jobs ordered to pay 405 million to land owners who

98 Mar 5, 2009
Reply by Antsu-in-Japan

"If the issue involves potential litigation I don't think "a tiny cut of the deal" wi…"

Jay Murrell replied Feb 28, 2009 to Lawyer Fees

6 Feb 28, 2009
Reply by Checkmateking

"The way I read the FY2010 budget proposals, Obama wants to do away with most of the…"

Jay Murrell replied Feb 28, 2009 to Why Natural Companies Will Ultimately Curtail Drilling - Obama's Proposed Budget/Specifically Page S6 Lines 29 - 43

1 Feb 28, 2009
Reply by Jay Murrell

"KB: I believe it is the case that failure to pay royalties after demand is grouds f…"

Jay Murrell replied Feb 27, 2009 to I challenge anyone in this forum to disprove the following statement:

63 Mar 12, 2009
Reply by lanadan Ds3

"KB: Everything you said is exactly right. Allow me to add that some operators - who…"

Jay Murrell replied Feb 27, 2009 to Twin cities no longer does group negotiations

139 Apr 27, 2009
Reply by Kat Bloomfield

"Good point, however, I posit that the possibility of getting stuck in a $12M HA late…"

Jay Murrell replied Feb 27, 2009 to I challenge anyone in this forum to disprove the following statement:

63 Mar 12, 2009
Reply by lanadan Ds3

"Snake: I have seen so many (very well considered) mathematical augments posited as…"

Jay Murrell replied Feb 27, 2009 to I challenge anyone in this forum to disprove the following statement:

63 Mar 12, 2009
Reply by lanadan Ds3

"no insult intended, but concern noted and I will adjust accordingly...:-)"

Jay Murrell replied Feb 27, 2009 to I challenge anyone in this forum to disprove the following statement:

63 Mar 12, 2009
Reply by lanadan Ds3

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Blog Posts

The Lithium Connection to Shale Drilling

Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…

Continue

Posted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service