Eric Camp's Discussions (56)

View

Discussions Replied To (44)	Replies	Latest Activity
landowner "Yes they can. See the recent Finley Resources Case decided by the Railroad Commissio…" Eric Camp replied Feb 4, 2009 to Update on please help discussion. Another Shelby county post	56	Feb 9, 2009 Reply by kane
landowner "I agree with Two Dogs and Jim. The surest way to make sure you are ok is to get a re…" Eric Camp replied Feb 1, 2009 to Wondering if my lease is good	19	Feb 4, 2009 Reply by Jack Blake
Oil & Gas Pro "Just FYI... Chesapeake's affiliated pipeline company in Louisiana is Louisiana Midst…" Eric Camp replied Feb 1, 2009 to Laying Pipelines Over Lands Covered By Non-Surface Use Leases	45	Feb 5, 2009 Reply by Robert G. Oliver
Oil & Gas Pro "While I agree with KB that the lease may bind the subsidiaries actions, perhaps a be…" Eric Camp replied Feb 1, 2009 to Laying Pipelines Over Lands Covered By Non-Surface Use Leases	45	Feb 5, 2009 Reply by Robert G. Oliver
Oil & Gas Pro "Parker, Any type of gas pipeline - gathering, transmission or otherwise - is going…" Eric Camp replied Jan 30, 2009 to Laying Pipelines Over Lands Covered By Non-Surface Use Leases	45	Feb 5, 2009 Reply by Robert G. Oliver
Oil & Gas Pro "Gathering Line from Lessee's well. Lessee is getting around non-surface use lease by…" Eric Camp replied Jan 30, 2009 to Laying Pipelines Over Lands Covered By Non-Surface Use Leases	45	Feb 5, 2009 Reply by Robert G. Oliver
Oil & Gas Pro "And damages for breach of contract (the lease) and damages caused by the right-of-wa…" Eric Camp replied Jan 30, 2009 to Laying Pipelines Over Lands Covered By Non-Surface Use Leases	45	Feb 5, 2009 Reply by Robert G. Oliver
Oil & Gas Pro "Not a NIMBY case at all... Joe the Landowner wants their minerals developed but not…" Eric Camp replied Jan 30, 2009 to Laying Pipelines Over Lands Covered By Non-Surface Use Leases	45	Feb 5, 2009 Reply by Robert G. Oliver
Oil & Gas Pro "True. But that landowner is the exception, not the rule. And that landowner is in a…" Eric Camp replied Jan 30, 2009 to Laying Pipelines Over Lands Covered By Non-Surface Use Leases	45	Feb 5, 2009 Reply by Robert G. Oliver
Oil & Gas Pro "It is a unit well and the land is in the unit... But the landowner negotiated a non-…" Eric Camp replied Jan 29, 2009 to Laying Pipelines Over Lands Covered By Non-Surface Use Leases	45	Feb 5, 2009 Reply by Robert G. Oliver

Welcome to
GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Sign Up
or Sign In

Or sign in with:

📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Click Forum and scroll down past the last discussion and click the "Follow" button.

Top Content

1	Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map
2	More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs
3	Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5
4	Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high
5	Unleased Louisiana Mineral Owners Are on the Hook for Post-Production Costs
6	Rockcliff III Counters Haynesville Inventory Concerns with Shelby Trough Push
7	Request For Assistance

RSS
View All

Groups

Red River Parish

307 members
Natchitoches Parish

409 members

Unleased Mineral Owners

286 members
ALTERNATE ENERGY TECHNOL…

6 members

Union County, AR

49 members

View All

© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by

Badges | Report an Issue | Terms of Service

#xg { position:relative;top:120px; } #xn_bar { top:120px; }

Hello, you need to enable JavaScript to use GoHaynesvilleShale.com.

Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.