Les Bamburg's Discussions (5,266)

View

Discussions Replied To (3698)	Replies	Latest Activity
landowner "George, the LNG receiving terminals are onshore rather than offshore. They have not…" Les Bamburg replied Jan 27, 2009 to Would Exxon or BP be better or worse than Chesapeake for our area?	40	Jan 27, 2009 Reply by Les Bamburg
landowner "Roy, that is relevant for the Northeast because historically there was not enough ga…" Les Bamburg replied Jan 27, 2009 to Would Exxon or BP be better or worse than Chesapeake for our area?	40	Jan 27, 2009 Reply by Les Bamburg
Oil & Gas Pro "EPT, the following are some excerpts and an additional link: "ENERGY TRANSFER PARTN…" Les Bamburg replied Jan 27, 2009 to Proposed pipeline	3	Jan 27, 2009 Reply by Les Bamburg
landowner "LP, unfortunately news people seem to always be behind times on reality. That story…" Les Bamburg replied Jan 27, 2009 to Would Exxon or BP be better or worse than Chesapeake for our area?	40	Jan 27, 2009 Reply by Les Bamburg
landowner "KB, you would not believe how strongly the anti-trust laws are enforced against the…" Les Bamburg replied Jan 27, 2009 to Would Exxon or BP be better or worse than Chesapeake for our area?	40	Jan 27, 2009 Reply by Les Bamburg
landowner "BirdDawg, I know it is hard to believe but between 2000 & 2005 US gas production…" Les Bamburg replied Jan 27, 2009 to Would Exxon or BP be better or worse than Chesapeake for our area?	40	Jan 27, 2009 Reply by Les Bamburg
landowner "Baron, sorry but we export natural gas to Mexico rather than import." Les Bamburg replied Jan 27, 2009 to Would Exxon or BP be better or worse than Chesapeake for our area?	40	Jan 27, 2009 Reply by Les Bamburg
"Mike, no but the following well has been permitted one mile south: EnCana, L Adcock…" Les Bamburg replied Jan 26, 2009 to Insight into Encana	48	Jan 27, 2009 Reply by Micheal P. Loftin
"HGH, for the Haynesville Shale the Martin Field covers the following: T13N-R8W; Sec…" Les Bamburg replied Jan 25, 2009 to Insight into Encana	48	Jan 27, 2009 Reply by Micheal P. Loftin
"Sam, Southern Star drilled the following well in the adjacent section that logged 31…" Les Bamburg replied Jan 24, 2009 to Township 19N Sec 19 Range 13 W	10	Jan 27, 2009 Reply by Sue

‹ Previous
1
…
318
319
320
321
322
…
370
Next ›

Welcome to
GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Sign Up
or Sign In

Or sign in with:

📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Click Forum and scroll down past the last discussion and click the "Follow" button.

Top Content

1	Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map
2	More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs
3	Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5
4	Adjustments to revenue statemens older than 3 years by BPX
5	Unleased Louisiana Mineral Owners Are on the Hook for Post-Production Costs
6	Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high
7	Request For Assistance

RSS
View All

Groups

Red River Parish

307 members
Natchitoches Parish

409 members

Unleased Mineral Owners

286 members
ALTERNATE ENERGY TECHNOL…

6 members

Union County, AR

49 members

View All

© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by

Badges | Report an Issue | Terms of Service

#xg { position:relative;top:120px; } #xn_bar { top:120px; }

Hello, you need to enable JavaScript to use GoHaynesvilleShale.com.

Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.