Les Bamburg's Discussions (5,266)

View

Discussions Replied To (3698)	Replies	Latest Activity
landowner "George, the LNG receiving terminals are onshore rather than offshore. They have not…" Les Bamburg replied Jan 27, 2009 to Would Exxon or BP be better or worse than Chesapeake for our area?	40	Jan 27, 2009 Reply by Les Bamburg
landowner "Roy, that is relevant for the Northeast because historically there was not enough ga…" Les Bamburg replied Jan 27, 2009 to Would Exxon or BP be better or worse than Chesapeake for our area?	40	Jan 27, 2009 Reply by Les Bamburg
Oil & Gas Pro "EPT, the following are some excerpts and an additional link: "ENERGY TRANSFER PARTN…" Les Bamburg replied Jan 27, 2009 to Proposed pipeline	3	Jan 27, 2009 Reply by Les Bamburg
landowner "LP, unfortunately news people seem to always be behind times on reality. That story…" Les Bamburg replied Jan 27, 2009 to Would Exxon or BP be better or worse than Chesapeake for our area?	40	Jan 27, 2009 Reply by Les Bamburg
landowner "KB, you would not believe how strongly the anti-trust laws are enforced against the…" Les Bamburg replied Jan 27, 2009 to Would Exxon or BP be better or worse than Chesapeake for our area?	40	Jan 27, 2009 Reply by Les Bamburg
landowner "BirdDawg, I know it is hard to believe but between 2000 & 2005 US gas production…" Les Bamburg replied Jan 27, 2009 to Would Exxon or BP be better or worse than Chesapeake for our area?	40	Jan 27, 2009 Reply by Les Bamburg
landowner "Baron, sorry but we export natural gas to Mexico rather than import." Les Bamburg replied Jan 27, 2009 to Would Exxon or BP be better or worse than Chesapeake for our area?	40	Jan 27, 2009 Reply by Les Bamburg
"Mike, no but the following well has been permitted one mile south: EnCana, L Adcock…" Les Bamburg replied Jan 26, 2009 to Insight into Encana	48	Jan 27, 2009 Reply by Micheal P. Loftin
"HGH, for the Haynesville Shale the Martin Field covers the following: T13N-R8W; Sec…" Les Bamburg replied Jan 25, 2009 to Insight into Encana	48	Jan 27, 2009 Reply by Micheal P. Loftin
"Sam, Southern Star drilled the following well in the adjacent section that logged 31…" Les Bamburg replied Jan 24, 2009 to Township 19N Sec 19 Range 13 W	10	Jan 27, 2009 Reply by Sue

‹ Previous
1
…
318
319
320
321
322
…
370
Next ›

Welcome to
GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Sign Up
or Sign In

Or sign in with:

📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Visit the Forum and click "Follow" after the last discussion.

Top Content

1	DUC and Cover: Haynesville Crosses 60 Rigs as Producers Bank Wells
2	Adamas Royalties?
3	Advice Requested on Expand Royalty Deductions
4	Set alarm for me
5	USGS drops new numbers on natural gas found in Bossier formation. It's years worth.
6	Apex now leasing
7	Beware the PSA

RSS
View All

Groups

North LA Cotton Valley C…

68 members
Shelby County, TX

478 members

Nacogdoches County

194 members
SMACKOVER LITHIUM GROUP …

11 members

Natchitoches Parish

405 members
WESTERN HAYNESVILLE

18 members

Bienville Parish, LA

250 members
Sabine Parish, LA

457 members

SMACKOVER LITHIUM GROUP …

11 members
San Augustine, TX

388 members

View All

Blog Posts

landowner

Tuscaloosa Trend Sits On Top Of Poorest Neighbourhood For Decades - Yet No Royalties Ever Paid To The Community -- Why??

Posted by Char on May 29, 2025 at 14:42 — 4 Comments

© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by

Badges | Report an Issue | Terms of Service

#xg { position:relative;top:120px; } #xn_bar { top:120px; }

Hello, you need to enable JavaScript to use GoHaynesvilleShale.com.

Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.