Les Bamburg's Discussions (5,266)

View

Discussions Replied To (3698)	Replies	Latest Activity
"Essay, it is not quick as it takes 4 years to build. A much quicker solution is to i…" Les Bamburg replied Nov 23, 2010 to Project aims to liquefy U.S. natural gas	16	Nov 26, 2010 Reply by Les Bamburg
"Ronny, Petrohawk (KCS), EG Plantation #63 Well, Serial #237344, S9-T16N-R11W, Bossi…" Les Bamburg replied Nov 23, 2010 to Production flow data from early Haynesville wells	23	Nov 28, 2010 Reply by ronda and bruce
"Robert, you have to hire someone to lock up the coal lobby in Washington DC." Les Bamburg replied Nov 23, 2010 to Project aims to liquefy U.S. natural gas	16	Nov 26, 2010 Reply by Les Bamburg
"Jack, the project you are referencing was an offshore LNG import terminal with open…" Les Bamburg replied Nov 23, 2010 to Project aims to liquefy U.S. natural gas	16	Nov 26, 2010 Reply by Les Bamburg
"Logger, it is not easy or cheap - but it can be done. That is what is being consider…" Les Bamburg replied Nov 23, 2010 to Project aims to liquefy U.S. natural gas	16	Nov 26, 2010 Reply by Les Bamburg
landowner "Fetz, I have attached a copy of the unit application and map. SU53 consists only of…" Les Bamburg replied Nov 22, 2010 to Well Number 239530 in Section 23, T17N, R16W	14	Nov 22, 2010 Reply by Fetz
landowner "AL, some areas are being commercially developed today since they are economic at low…" Les Bamburg replied Nov 21, 2010 to HS question	19	Nov 22, 2010 Reply by BirdDawg, plain ole' idiot
landowner "Robert, it is primarily the function of royalty payments, capital cost and the high…" Les Bamburg replied Nov 21, 2010 to HS question	19	Nov 22, 2010 Reply by BirdDawg, plain ole' idiot
landowner "Fetz, Petrohawk is the Haynesville Unit operator and may have most of the deeper rig…" Les Bamburg replied Nov 21, 2010 to Well Number 239530 in Section 23, T17N, R16W	14	Nov 22, 2010 Reply by Fetz
landowner "Fetz, you section has a Haynesville Unit but no permitted Haynesville Shale well. S…" Les Bamburg replied Nov 21, 2010 to Well Number 239530 in Section 23, T17N, R16W	14	Nov 22, 2010 Reply by Fetz

‹ Previous
1
…
91
92
93
94
95
…
370
Next ›

Welcome to
GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Sign Up
or Sign In

Or sign in with:

📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Click Forum and scroll down past the last discussion and click the "Follow" button.

Top Content

1	Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map
2	More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs
3	Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5
4	Adjustments to revenue statemens older than 3 years by BPX
5	Unleased Louisiana Mineral Owners Are on the Hook for Post-Production Costs
6	Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high
7	Request For Assistance

RSS
View All

Groups

Red River Parish

307 members
Natchitoches Parish

409 members

Unleased Mineral Owners

286 members
ALTERNATE ENERGY TECHNOL…

6 members

Union County, AR

49 members

View All

© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by

Badges | Report an Issue | Terms of Service

#xg { position:relative;top:120px; } #xn_bar { top:120px; }

Hello, you need to enable JavaScript to use GoHaynesvilleShale.com.

Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.