Ben Elmore's Discussions (276)

Discussions Replied To (108) Replies Latest Activity

"Just like the past 12 years of oil and gas opinions issued by the 9 members of the T…"

Ben Elmore replied Aug 31, 2012 to Chesapeake squeezes landowners on costs amid cash crunch

31 Sep 11, 2012
Reply by adubu

"I've been successful in getting this language in a number of leases.  As with everyt…"

Ben Elmore replied Aug 17, 2012 to MAGNOLIA POINT MINERALS VS CHK LA AND PXP LA - CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-00854 (Decision On No Cost Royalty Language)

85 Dec 19, 2012
Reply by Jo Ann Carter

"As a caveat, this is just a suggestion and should not be taken as legal advice.  Thi…"

Ben Elmore replied Aug 17, 2012 to MAGNOLIA POINT MINERALS VS CHK LA AND PXP LA - CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-00854 (Decision On No Cost Royalty Language)

85 Dec 19, 2012
Reply by Jo Ann Carter

"I certainly agree the clause was poorly drafted, and that seems to be the primary ba…"

Ben Elmore replied Aug 13, 2012 to MAGNOLIA POINT MINERALS VS CHK LA AND PXP LA - CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-00854 (Decision On No Cost Royalty Language)

85 Dec 19, 2012
Reply by Jo Ann Carter

"I thought you said the judge "may have gotten this one right as a matter of law?" wh…"

Ben Elmore replied Aug 12, 2012 to MAGNOLIA POINT MINERALS VS CHK LA AND PXP LA - CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-00854 (Decision On No Cost Royalty Language)

85 Dec 19, 2012
Reply by Jo Ann Carter

"That is also my problem with the opinion.  The judge ignores the parties "in the eve…"

Ben Elmore replied Aug 10, 2012 to MAGNOLIA POINT MINERALS VS CHK LA AND PXP LA - CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-00854 (Decision On No Cost Royalty Language)

85 Dec 19, 2012
Reply by Jo Ann Carter

"Andrew, What I find frustrating about this case is the court says the law obligates…"

Ben Elmore replied Aug 10, 2012 to MAGNOLIA POINT MINERALS VS CHK LA AND PXP LA - CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-00854 (Decision On No Cost Royalty Language)

85 Dec 19, 2012
Reply by Jo Ann Carter

"Yes, this is a federal judge appointed for life. "

Ben Elmore replied Aug 10, 2012 to MAGNOLIA POINT MINERALS VS CHK LA AND PXP LA - CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-00854 (Decision On No Cost Royalty Language)

85 Dec 19, 2012
Reply by Jo Ann Carter

"This officially brings LA law in line with TX law on the interplay between a market…"

Ben Elmore replied Aug 9, 2012 to MAGNOLIA POINT MINERALS VS CHK LA AND PXP LA - CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-00854 (Decision On No Cost Royalty Language)

85 Dec 19, 2012
Reply by Jo Ann Carter

"I agree with Les, but where is his label?"

Ben Elmore replied Jul 26, 2012 to Feedback Wanted: The Avatar Labels

37 Aug 4, 2012
Reply by TangiHopeful

RSS

© 2021   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service