Replies to This Discussion

landownerPermalink Reply by SL on November 8, 2009 at 7:54

300/rod and 2500/AC. Not sure if this is good or not. If you have any info, please let me know. I know this post is over a year old, but any updates would be appreciated.

• ▶ Reply

landownerPermalink Reply by Bacon on November 8, 2009 at 9:20

Trying to find the same thing regarding the Tiger pipeline with no luck so far.

• ▶ Reply

landownerPermalink Reply by SL on November 8, 2009 at 9:25

Have you had an offer from them? If so, do you mind disclosing?

• ▶ Reply

landownerPermalink Reply by Bacon on November 8, 2009 at 13:05

Initial offer from them is $7125 an acre for permanent ROW (60') and $1425 per acre for the temporary workspace (65'). No mention of rods. Keep in mind thats a 42" pipeline.

• ▶ Reply

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Randy on November 8, 2009 at 15:56

The permanent ROW number appears to be $142.50/rod, maybe somebody can check my math. So um, yeah I'd tell em to KMA.

• ▶ Reply

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Dion Warr, CPL on November 10, 2009 at 14:08

Bacon:

Is this for multiple lines, or single for the 42? Seems like a lot of space and TWS for a single.

Randy:

From the above offer, I get $161.93/rod @ 60' width

$7125/ac. x (1 ac./43560 sq.ft) x (60 ft [width]) x 1 rod [length]) x (16.5 ft / 1 rod)

The math does not look appreciably better, but a little different.

• ▶ Reply

landownerPermalink Reply by Bacon on November 11, 2009 at 5:52

If I'm reading the plat right, yes, one 42" pipeline. Apparently they changed the alignment to parallel the Gulf South and not the Centerpoint in our area since this plat.

Attachments:

• Untitled-1a.jpg, 55 KB

• ▶ Reply