How much does the ArklaTex stand to lose in taxes if Obama wins?

My guess is if income tax rates are increased to the amount stated under his plan, that billions more in taxes on royalties and lease bonuses in the ArkLaTex will be sent to the government. Even a 10 acre landowner who gets a nice leasing bonus is gonna get nailed for being one of the "evil" rich people making more than 250k per year in household income.

Views: 367

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by EASYMONEY on July 28, 2008 at 6:42
I WAS UNDER THE IMPRESSION, THIS SITE WAS FOR OIL, GAS, MINERALS LEASING,ETC., NOT A POLITICAL SITE.
ANYONE WHO KNOWS THE LORD, KNOWS HIS WILL, WILL BE DONE, WETHER OBAMA BECOMES PRESIDENT OR NOT.
BY THE WAY, IF YOU'RE LOOKING AT A NAME TO GIVE YOU COMFORT IN HOW THIS COUNTRY SHOULD BE RUN, I FEEL SORRY FOR YOU.
NOW FOR ALL THE SMART PEOPLE; IN CASE YOU DIDN'T KNOW: A REPUBLICAN IS A HUMAN BEING AND A DEMOCRAT IS A HUMAN BEING. THE HUMAN BEING THAT SCREWED THIS COUNTRY AND ECONOMY UP IS A REPUBLICAN WHO HAS PROVEN HE DID NOT HAVE THE SMARTS TO RUN THIS COUNTRY, WHO'S NAME HAPPENS TO BE GEORGE. LOL, LOL, LOL; THE JOKE IS ON YOU. NOW, WHO'S LOOKING LIKE A FOOL. AND JUST THINK YOUR CONFIDENCE WAS IN SOMEONE'S NAME, NOT THEIR INTELLIGENCE. OH, BUT YOU DON'T HAVE ANY INTELLIGENCE TO THINK THE WAY YOU ARE. NEXT TIME, BE SMART, KEEP YOUR DUMB COMMENTS INSIDE YOUR EMPTY HEAD. GUESS WHAT I AM? A REPUBLICAN OR A DEMOCRAT. NO, STUPID, I AM A HUMAN BEING!!!
Permalink Reply by OLD HILLBILLY on July 28, 2008 at 6:48
does it matter? thr irs will get 33% to 40% of what ever anyone gets , but the oil and gas companys got the tax breaks , so why worry , I AGREE GOD IS IN CONTROL ,
Permalink Reply by Natch N3 on July 28, 2008 at 6:50
He who knows nothing and knows it so fluently...Easymoney.....the post is referring to the taxes that Obama wishes to impose i.e. capital gains to 49%, .07% to the United Nations, not to mention he is a socialist and may consider mineral rights as belonging to the "people." Understand the question before embarking on stupidity.
Permalink Reply by easttexas12 on July 28, 2008 at 7:26
Obama never said 49% capitol gains tax, geez. He doesn't want to take your guns, bibles, mineral rights, children, tractors or spouses etc.. If you want to state that he does, then back it up with facts...
By seeing the world through a wide prism (well read, educated, diversity of friends etc..) its much more rewarding and enlightening than seeing through a narrow focus prism. When you read something that makes you uncomfortable, odds are the topic hasn't been within your point of reference before with an open mind. That's why its so important to read books on many subjects to form that wide prism perspective.
Permalink Reply by Natch N3 on July 28, 2008 at 7:46
Easttexas..I did back it up with the facts...obviously you are not well read, educated, etc....his bill to give the UN .07 of our GNP will be voted on soon..he authored it. And actually income tax for those over $250,000 per year will be 53%...and not to mention that his plan to insure 47 million uninsured (non americans unlike) is one of his objectives. The topic was taxes..if you want to broaden it I will. Please follow your own advice...
Permalink Reply by easttexas12 on July 28, 2008 at 8:12
Why would the Senate vote to give the U.N. money? Answer: The U.S. owes the United Nations millions, we are the only country belonging to the U.N. that are dead beats. Now, we could ask Communist China to finance more of our debt so we can pay our dues to the U.N. or we can pass a tax. There are no other alternatives. Have an alternative, I would be honored to hear one.
I have no problem paying 53% in taxes (over 250K) so medium & low income families can have affordable health care (non Americans too). What would Jesus do? I believe we all know the answer to that.
Permalink Reply by Natch N3 on July 28, 2008 at 8:01
Main Entry: so·cial·ism
Function: noun
Pronunciation: 'sO-sh&-"li-z&m
1 : any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
2 a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state
3 : a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done

Easttexas...is wealth re-distribution a part of the above stated definition. I am relying on your informed opinion. Do you wish to discuss the 2nd Amendment now under Obama's plan?
Permalink Reply by Natch N3 on July 28, 2008 at 8:09
http://www.gunowners.org/pres08/obama.htm

Easttexas "He doesn't want to take your guns."

Obama on 2nd Amend.
Permalink Reply by Natch N3 on July 28, 2008 at 8:13
Easttexas here some more reading material for you

Demos want to nationalize oil companies..similiar to healthcare

http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2008/05/leading-democrat-calls-fo...

hope this helps you widen your prism
Permalink Reply by Johnyd on July 28, 2008 at 8:04
Easymoney....You ever heard the name Nancy Pelosi? Keep Voting people like that in.....and you will be paying 7 dollars a gallon for gas....and you will be Riding your bike to church if your lucky....it maybe called a temple by then.....also just to let you know......George W Bush has done a hell of job as president....if you want Big Government....Vote em' in but dont be on this site crying when your gas well is paying for all of the government housing on your land... that your paying taxes on.... and was forced to sell by the betternation clause or some bs they will dream up to take it away from you.....all i ask is dont BIt_h to me about it...
Permalink Reply by EASYMONEY on July 28, 2008 at 10:09
lohnyd...you said it yourself, and might i add; very well spoken:GEORGE W. BUSH HAS DONE A HELL OF A JOB AS A PRESIDENT. JUST LOOK AROUND YOU BABE; FOR INSTANCE, THE GAS PRICE NOW!!!
Permalink Reply by easttexas12 on July 28, 2008 at 8:16
Why would the Senate vote to give the U.N. money? Answer: The U.S. owes the United Nations millions, we are the only country belonging to the U.N. that are dead beats. Now, we could ask Communist China to finance more of our debt so we can pay our dues to the U.N. or we can pass a tax. There are no other alternatives. Have an alternative, I would be honored to hear one.
I have no problem paying 53% in taxes (over 250K) so medium & low income families can have affordable health care (non Americans too). What would Jesus do? I believe we all know the answer to that.

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Top Content 

1 Comstock October Presentation

Comstock October Presentation
2 Pending Public Oil and Gas Hearings

Pending Public Oil and Gas Hearings
3 Authority for Expenditure

Authority for Expenditure
4 Unleased Mineral Interest

Unleased Mineral Interest
5 Alarm Bells Are Ringing

Alarm Bells Are Ringing
6 Arkansas Smackover Lithium Play

Arkansas Smackover Lithium Play
7 For Erica Woodward

For Erica Woodward
8 How EVs are changing the future of oil demand - IEA

How EVs are changing the future of oil demand - IEA
9 Request to GHS.com Members

Request to GHS.com Members
10 Arkansas O&G Commission unanimously denies royalty rate application for lithium extraction

Arkansas O&G Commission unanimously denies royalty rate application for lithium extraction

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service