Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Lee on August 14, 2008 at 10:23

Could it have something to do with the fact that stateline (TX & LA) is right to the west of the unit?

What can be done, realistically, to change it if you have acreage in the unit? My sibling, a PE, says "nuthin."

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by michele-C2 on August 14, 2008 at 10:30

I cant be sure by looking at this, but it does not appear that T16W, R16N, Sec 1 is affected by this. Can anyone confirm or deny?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BIGWOOD66 on August 14, 2008 at 10:39

I got that Baron but think of the guy who owns the 330' over the line they have made. He will see little if anything. They can effectively tie up other sections, since their proposal crosses the lines stop other drilling, etc. Why try to lease a section if you can't have the whole thing?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by DrWAVeSport Cd1 on August 14, 2008 at 10:41

BIGWOOD66,

BINGO!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by The_Baron on August 14, 2008 at 11:12

The goal is not to lease a section, but to lease the unit. Those outside these units will be included in other units down the line.

once again, look at the existing units in the cotton valley for these same sections. They are not "regular" units ethier. besides we have it easy, come down to South LA where the units are not geographic, but geological. Some of those look like a drunk ameoba.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by DrWAVeSport Cd1 on August 14, 2008 at 11:16

Horizontal wells? And, those are the only ones that will produce the Mega Bucks that CHK and PK are TOUTING! Not Vertical ones!!! So...WITHIN OR OUTSIDE OR AROUND THE CORNER, OR IN AN UNLEASED PARTIALLY LEASED UNIT??????...WHERE ARE THEY GOING TO DRILL AND WHAT ARE THEY GOING TO DRILL?????

This document is truly not justifiable as it stands! (imho)

DrWAVeSport CD1

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by The_Baron on August 14, 2008 at 11:23

Look at the proposed unit wells on the plat.

These will be the initial wells. Other wells in the unit will be alternate unit wells. The spacing will be determined by the state.

It does not matter what they intend to drill. A unit needs to be in place so they know who needs to be leased. without a unit they will simply be drilling leashold wells. It is to everyones advantage to have a declared unit.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Randy on August 14, 2008 at 11:27

Has anyone pointed out these are 1720 acre units? Or am I crazy

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Foxiecajun on August 14, 2008 at 13:19

Next will be the 1920 acre Units Chesapeake is now putting in their lease forms.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by James CD1 on August 14, 2008 at 13:39

Commish Welsh wasn't aware of o/g rtying to redefine the HS to be the lower Cotton Valley either. Just exactly what is Comm. Welsh aware of. I am still waiting for him to answer my question on why and to whose benefit and how much of a finanical impact that had on hbp landowners. I think he should be forced to answer our questions. How can we demand some answers? Anybody have any
ideas?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by James CD1 on August 14, 2008 at 13:56

What exactly are you saying- that Commissioner Welsh ONLY knows the day his paycheck comes in and that he has to put oil and gas in his car? Surely you not saying that is all of the qualifications that he has? I really don't know how to take your answer.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by michele-C2 on August 14, 2008 at 13:52

Anyone care to take a stab at the question about T16W, R16N, Sec 1? Sure would appreciate it!!

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• Next ›
• Page