Views: 63

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

SB, I am bullish on natural gas assuming the coal interests in congress can be kept at bay by the administration in Washington. The only issue is we may have sub $8/MMBtu natural gas prices for some time.
When the royalty owner is receiving $3.50 or less for his/her gas, $7-8 would seem like an explosion to the upside to me and I would be extremely satisfied with that price. I see LNG as the primary risk rather than coal.
SB, in the near term (thru 2010) I agree LNG will keep prices depressed. After that date improvements the Asian & European economies should lessen the LNG supply issue.

Longer term natural gas has to expand its share of the power gen market in order to increase demand. This means taking on the coal states in Washington.
So where do you believe all this funding for all these programs are going to be coming from?
PG, most of the bigger programs don't kick in until after 2024 when the auction dollars will start being available. Prior to that date there is some fairly limited costs related to research programs.

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Blog Posts

Tuscaloosa Trend Sits On Top Of Poorest Neighbourhood For Decades - Yet No Royalties Ever Paid To The Community -- Why??

In researching the decades-old Tuscaloosa Trend and the immense wealth it has generated for many, I find it deeply troubling that this resource-rich formation runs directly beneath one of the poorest communities in North Baton Rouge—near Southern University, Louisiana—yet neither the university ( that I am aware of)  nor local residents appear to have received any compensation for the minerals extracted from their land.

This area has suffered immense environmental degradation…

Continue

Posted by Char on May 29, 2025 at 14:42

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2025   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service