Confusing scout report
Can anyone tell me if there is anything related to
possible production form the following scout report:
| FIELD | ST CD | PT | WELL CLASS | EFF DATE | END DATE | STAT DATE | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 242087 | LCV RA SU115;DEBROECK 33 | 003-ALT | E183 | 3608 | 01 | 00 | 09/24/2010 | 09/24/2010 |
SCOUT INFO
| REPORT DATE | WELL STATUS | MEASURED DEPTH | TRUE VERT DEPTH | DETAIL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/24/2010 | 01 | 17500 | 987' FSL & 1576' FWL OF SEC 33. PBHL: 250' FNL & 1670' FWL OF SEC 33. |
Views: 23
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on -
The well is permitted but not yet drilled.
-
Permalink Reply by john hamilton on
-
Thank you for the response. Might you further your insight and knowledge on the Shale and let me know if this paticular area of Elm Grove has shown success or failure according to past results from nearby horizantal well reports. Can you take a guess on when Exco might continue their opearations on any of the three Debroeck 33 wells. My family leased 250 acres in this unit (033 16n,13w) and are confused on how such a large bonus could be payed by any oil company based on a guess.
I tried contacting Exco but have not had my calls returned. Surely they will
get Camterra's blunders in order someday. ?Right?
Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com
Top Content
Not a member? Get our email.
Groups
-
San Augustine, TX
386 members
-
Natchitoches Parish
399 members
-
Cass County, TX
119 members
-
Franklin County, Texas
8 members
-
Rusk County
97 members
-
Vernon Parish
59 members
-
Bienville Parish, LA
242 members
-
Sabine County, Texas
172 members
-
Sabine Parish, LA
455 members
-
Angelina County, TX
87 members
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
