Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Bear Dog on February 23, 2012 at 6:15

Still no DO!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by RJ on February 21, 2012 at 12:51

I have 3 separate ones now. Two for section 30 and one for section 31. When added up also came up short. I have seen some petrahawk Division orders and they are EXACT to what was on the owners lease. Mine was .43 and should have been .50. Granted CHKs are close but do they have some sort of tolerance either way or something. This is not their first Rodeo. Are they taking advantage of the fine print if there is any or something?? I have not heard back From CHK either.Not sure I will. Anyone out there have any of these problems with CHK in the past? There are several experts on this forum who could help us out if they would see our post.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Katie McCullin on February 23, 2012 at 3:22

Hi - this is Katie with Chesapeake. I know several of you have been discussing these issues with our Division Orders group. If there's anything I can do to further assist, I'm happy to do so. Thanks!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by RJ on February 23, 2012 at 5:08

Katie,Thanks for the reply. My concern was the fact that the division orders total acres does not add up to whats on my lease. its .07 short or about 2% short.Others in in this section also have the same problem. I just got an e mail from CHK with a letter that shows the method used to calculate the amount of land we own. Methods or not should the division orders not add up to what we leased to CHK??? So is everone going to donate 2% of their land to CHK??? Would appreciate any help on this matter.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Katie McCullin on February 23, 2012 at 5:24

Hey RJ - I can put you in contact with someone who can break down the math and explain the answers to your questions. If you would like to speak with them, message me. Thanks!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by RJ on February 23, 2012 at 5:33

Hey Katie, Larry,who also reported a problem says he found the math error. HE said he has wrote CHK and is awaiting a response. He explains what he found on his post about CHK community lease. You can find it on the todays top content. I can also pass it on to him if you have a person that could look at his figures.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Katie McCullin on February 23, 2012 at 5:38

Great! Let me know if I can do anything!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by The_Baron on February 23, 2012 at 8:20

RJ,

many times the lease acreage is just a close approximate. thats why the discription says.. ,ore or less.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by RJ on February 23, 2012 at 11:50

Baron you may have a good point. However I wonder how many times it is less rather than more as in this case. Thanks

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Gamma on February 23, 2012 at 10:18

Hi Katie,

Is there any way you can tell me what my royality check will be. I know it is supposed to mailed out on the 29th just anxious to know what the amount might be.

Thanks,

Bec

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Katie McCullin on February 23, 2012 at 10:21

Hi Bec!

If you call our contact center at 1-877-CHK-1GAS, they can look at your specific lease and go over what the royalty payment might be. Payments are based on a variety of factors and can fluctuate from month to month. Let me know if you have any questions or need help with anything!

Thanks!

Katie

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Melvin Deutsch on February 23, 2012 at 8:10

Our well has been producing since April 2011, and still no DO!! I wrote an email last week and was told I needed to be patient!! REALLY.  CHK, scares me right now.  The age old excuse of being behind, well there is a limit, and if they are that far behind then THEY need to address the issue.  I've been told of nightmares such as this with CHK

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• …
• 8
• Next ›
• Page