Oil & Gas Pro

Does anybody want to divide up the site between Shale and everything else?

I would like to know if anyone else besides me is interested in a split home page with Shale threads on top, then all of the other banter below in a separate thread section. This separate thread section could still be active where the hot threads go to the top, but they would not compete with the Shale threads. Thoughts anyone? The current tone of the site seems to be non Shale.
Jay

Views: 404

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion


Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on April 15, 2009 at 13:39
Count me in.

landownerPermalink Reply by Bobi Carr ("parker") on April 15, 2009 at 13:45
Lots of things that sound good in theory don't necessarily work in practice, but a STRICTLY SHALE GROUP OR AREA sounds good to me.

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Two Dogs, Pirate on April 15, 2009 at 15:41
Go for it Jay, I am with you.

landownerPermalink Reply by Cathaus on April 15, 2009 at 14:24
I think this decision is up to the person that owns, maintains and pays for this site.

landownerPermalink Reply by Cathaus on April 15, 2009 at 14:37
Let's face it Jay. There has not been anything too exciting going on lately. When things heat back up, I am sure we will once again be All about the Shale.

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on April 15, 2009 at 14:39
Yes, the decision is Keith's. And he appreciates feedback.

landownerPermalink Reply by RAY on April 16, 2009 at 12:53
this site is left as it is, I would like to see the [off the wall] COMMENTS that has nothing to do with the discussion DELETED

landownerPermalink Reply by Cathaus on April 15, 2009 at 14:42
I think he has a sense of humor. He enjoys some levity from time to time. I recommend it to everyone. Lord knows, we sure could use some in this day and age.

landownerPermalink Reply by Bobi Carr ("parker") on April 15, 2009 at 14:52
Cathaus,

I don't think the funny stuff is the problem (well it might be for a few).

I like when we can talk shale and have a little fun too, but a SERIOUS section only would be a welcome haven.

landownerPermalink Reply by LP on April 15, 2009 at 14:38
I would like such a split.

landownerPermalink Reply by Bob Ballard on April 15, 2009 at 14:55
I also vote for the split

landownerPermalink Reply by sesport on April 15, 2009 at 14:53
On the central main page, I see 20 discussions posted. Of those, 3 are categorized as political, 1 is categorized as "Out of Gas," 1 is categorized as financial and the remaining 15 are categorized as shale related topics. The majority of the topics are shale related, IMO.

The "hot" topics percolate to the top as responses are added. And if one is following a topic, how do any of the others interfere?

The blogs have their own split off to the side.

I'm not sure I understand the problem. The numbers don't support the notion that the main page topics are unfavorably weighted against shale topics, IMO.

best - sesport :0)

RSS

📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Click Forum and scroll down past the last discussion and click the "Follow" button.

Top Content 

1 Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map

Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map
2 More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs

More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs
3 Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5

Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5
4 Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high

Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high
5 Rockcliff III Counters Haynesville Inventory Concerns with Shelby Trough Push

Rockcliff III Counters Haynesville Inventory Concerns with Shelby Trough Push
6 Request For Assistance

Request For Assistance
7 The Curious Case of SAMSON CONTOUR

The Curious Case of SAMSON CONTOUR

Groups

© 2026   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service